| =============== |
| Pathname lookup |
| =============== |
| |
| This write-up is based on three articles published at lwn.net: |
| |
| - <https://lwn.net/Articles/649115/> Pathname lookup in Linux |
| - <https://lwn.net/Articles/649729/> RCU-walk: faster pathname lookup in Linux |
| - <https://lwn.net/Articles/650786/> A walk among the symlinks |
| |
| Written by Neil Brown with help from Al Viro and Jon Corbet. |
| It has subsequently been updated to reflect changes in the kernel |
| including: |
| |
| - per-directory parallel name lookup. |
| - ``openat2()`` resolution restriction flags. |
| |
| Introduction to pathname lookup |
| =============================== |
| |
| The most obvious aspect of pathname lookup, which very little |
| exploration is needed to discover, is that it is complex. There are |
| many rules, special cases, and implementation alternatives that all |
| combine to confuse the unwary reader. Computer science has long been |
| acquainted with such complexity and has tools to help manage it. One |
| tool that we will make extensive use of is "divide and conquer". For |
| the early parts of the analysis we will divide off symlinks - leaving |
| them until the final part. Well before we get to symlinks we have |
| another major division based on the VFS's approach to locking which |
| will allow us to review "REF-walk" and "RCU-walk" separately. But we |
| are getting ahead of ourselves. There are some important low level |
| distinctions we need to clarify first. |
| |
| There are two sorts of ... |
| -------------------------- |
| |
| .. _openat: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/openat.2.html |
| |
| Pathnames (sometimes "file names"), used to identify objects in the |
| filesystem, will be familiar to most readers. They contain two sorts |
| of elements: "slashes" that are sequences of one or more "``/``" |
| characters, and "components" that are sequences of one or more |
| non-"``/``" characters. These form two kinds of paths. Those that |
| start with slashes are "absolute" and start from the filesystem root. |
| The others are "relative" and start from the current directory, or |
| from some other location specified by a file descriptor given to |
| "``*at()``" system calls such as `openat() <openat_>`_. |
| |
| .. _execveat: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/execveat.2.html |
| |
| It is tempting to describe the second kind as starting with a |
| component, but that isn't always accurate: a pathname can lack both |
| slashes and components, it can be empty, in other words. This is |
| generally forbidden in POSIX, but some of those "``*at()``" system calls |
| in Linux permit it when the ``AT_EMPTY_PATH`` flag is given. For |
| example, if you have an open file descriptor on an executable file you |
| can execute it by calling `execveat() <execveat_>`_ passing |
| the file descriptor, an empty path, and the ``AT_EMPTY_PATH`` flag. |
| |
| These paths can be divided into two sections: the final component and |
| everything else. The "everything else" is the easy bit. In all cases |
| it must identify a directory that already exists, otherwise an error |
| such as ``ENOENT`` or ``ENOTDIR`` will be reported. |
| |
| The final component is not so simple. Not only do different system |
| calls interpret it quite differently (e.g. some create it, some do |
| not), but it might not even exist: neither the empty pathname nor the |
| pathname that is just slashes have a final component. If it does |
| exist, it could be "``.``" or "``..``" which are handled quite differently |
| from other components. |
| |
| .. _POSIX: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_12 |
| |
| If a pathname ends with a slash, such as "``/tmp/foo/``" it might be |
| tempting to consider that to have an empty final component. In many |
| ways that would lead to correct results, but not always. In |
| particular, ``mkdir()`` and ``rmdir()`` each create or remove a directory named |
| by the final component, and they are required to work with pathnames |
| ending in "``/``". According to POSIX_: |
| |
| A pathname that contains at least one non-<slash> character and |
| that ends with one or more trailing <slash> characters shall not |
| be resolved successfully unless the last pathname component before |
| the trailing <slash> characters names an existing directory or a |
| directory entry that is to be created for a directory immediately |
| after the pathname is resolved. |
| |
| The Linux pathname walking code (mostly in ``fs/namei.c``) deals with |
| all of these issues: breaking the path into components, handling the |
| "everything else" quite separately from the final component, and |
| checking that the trailing slash is not used where it isn't |
| permitted. It also addresses the important issue of concurrent |
| access. |
| |
| While one process is looking up a pathname, another might be making |
| changes that affect that lookup. One fairly extreme case is that if |
| "a/b" were renamed to "a/c/b" while another process were looking up |
| "a/b/..", that process might successfully resolve on "a/c". |
| Most races are much more subtle, and a big part of the task of |
| pathname lookup is to prevent them from having damaging effects. Many |
| of the possible races are seen most clearly in the context of the |
| "dcache" and an understanding of that is central to understanding |
| pathname lookup. |
| |
| More than just a cache |
| ---------------------- |
| |
| The "dcache" caches information about names in each filesystem to |
| make them quickly available for lookup. Each entry (known as a |
| "dentry") contains three significant fields: a component name, a |
| pointer to a parent dentry, and a pointer to the "inode" which |
| contains further information about the object in that parent with |
| the given name. The inode pointer can be ``NULL`` indicating that the |
| name doesn't exist in the parent. While there can be linkage in the |
| dentry of a directory to the dentries of the children, that linkage is |
| not used for pathname lookup, and so will not be considered here. |
| |
| The dcache has a number of uses apart from accelerating lookup. One |
| that will be particularly relevant is that it is closely integrated |
| with the mount table that records which filesystem is mounted where. |
| What the mount table actually stores is which dentry is mounted on top |
| of which other dentry. |
| |
| When considering the dcache, we have another of our "two types" |
| distinctions: there are two types of filesystems. |
| |
| Some filesystems ensure that the information in the dcache is always |
| completely accurate (though not necessarily complete). This can allow |
| the VFS to determine if a particular file does or doesn't exist |
| without checking with the filesystem, and means that the VFS can |
| protect the filesystem against certain races and other problems. |
| These are typically "local" filesystems such as ext3, XFS, and Btrfs. |
| |
| Other filesystems don't provide that guarantee because they cannot. |
| These are typically filesystems that are shared across a network, |
| whether remote filesystems like NFS and 9P, or cluster filesystems |
| like ocfs2 or cephfs. These filesystems allow the VFS to revalidate |
| cached information, and must provide their own protection against |
| awkward races. The VFS can detect these filesystems by the |
| ``DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE`` flag being set in the dentry. |
| |
| REF-walk: simple concurrency management with refcounts and spinlocks |
| -------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| |
| With all of those divisions carefully classified, we can now start |
| looking at the actual process of walking along a path. In particular |
| we will start with the handling of the "everything else" part of a |
| pathname, and focus on the "REF-walk" approach to concurrency |
| management. This code is found in the ``link_path_walk()`` function, if |
| you ignore all the places that only run when "``LOOKUP_RCU``" |
| (indicating the use of RCU-walk) is set. |
| |
| .. _Meet the Lockers: https://lwn.net/Articles/453685/ |
| |
| REF-walk is fairly heavy-handed with locks and reference counts. Not |
| as heavy-handed as in the old "big kernel lock" days, but certainly not |
| afraid of taking a lock when one is needed. It uses a variety of |
| different concurrency controls. A background understanding of the |
| various primitives is assumed, or can be gleaned from elsewhere such |
| as in `Meet the Lockers`_. |
| |
| The locking mechanisms used by REF-walk include: |
| |
| dentry->d_lockref |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| This uses the lockref primitive to provide both a spinlock and a |
| reference count. The special-sauce of this primitive is that the |
| conceptual sequence "lock; inc_ref; unlock;" can often be performed |
| with a single atomic memory operation. |
| |
| Holding a reference on a dentry ensures that the dentry won't suddenly |
| be freed and used for something else, so the values in various fields |
| will behave as expected. It also protects the ``->d_inode`` reference |
| to the inode to some extent. |
| |
| The association between a dentry and its inode is fairly permanent. |
| For example, when a file is renamed, the dentry and inode move |
| together to the new location. When a file is created the dentry will |
| initially be negative (i.e. ``d_inode`` is ``NULL``), and will be assigned |
| to the new inode as part of the act of creation. |
| |
| When a file is deleted, this can be reflected in the cache either by |
| setting ``d_inode`` to ``NULL``, or by removing it from the hash table |
| (described shortly) used to look up the name in the parent directory. |
| If the dentry is still in use the second option is used as it is |
| perfectly legal to keep using an open file after it has been deleted |
| and having the dentry around helps. If the dentry is not otherwise in |
| use (i.e. if the refcount in ``d_lockref`` is one), only then will |
| ``d_inode`` be set to ``NULL``. Doing it this way is more efficient for a |
| very common case. |
| |
| So as long as a counted reference is held to a dentry, a non-``NULL`` ``->d_inode`` |
| value will never be changed. |
| |
| dentry->d_lock |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| ``d_lock`` is a synonym for the spinlock that is part of ``d_lockref`` above. |
| For our purposes, holding this lock protects against the dentry being |
| renamed or unlinked. In particular, its parent (``d_parent``), and its |
| name (``d_name``) cannot be changed, and it cannot be removed from the |
| dentry hash table. |
| |
| When looking for a name in a directory, REF-walk takes ``d_lock`` on |
| each candidate dentry that it finds in the hash table and then checks |
| that the parent and name are correct. So it doesn't lock the parent |
| while searching in the cache; it only locks children. |
| |
| When looking for the parent for a given name (to handle "``..``"), |
| REF-walk can take ``d_lock`` to get a stable reference to ``d_parent``, |
| but it first tries a more lightweight approach. As seen in |
| ``dget_parent()``, if a reference can be claimed on the parent, and if |
| subsequently ``d_parent`` can be seen to have not changed, then there is |
| no need to actually take the lock on the child. |
| |
| rename_lock |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Looking up a given name in a given directory involves computing a hash |
| from the two values (the name and the dentry of the directory), |
| accessing that slot in a hash table, and searching the linked list |
| that is found there. |
| |
| When a dentry is renamed, the name and the parent dentry can both |
| change so the hash will almost certainly change too. This would move the |
| dentry to a different chain in the hash table. If a filename search |
| happened to be looking at a dentry that was moved in this way, |
| it might end up continuing the search down the wrong chain, |
| and so miss out on part of the correct chain. |
| |
| The name-lookup process (``d_lookup()``) does *not* try to prevent this |
| from happening, but only to detect when it happens. |
| ``rename_lock`` is a seqlock that is updated whenever any dentry is |
| renamed. If ``d_lookup`` finds that a rename happened while it |
| unsuccessfully scanned a chain in the hash table, it simply tries |
| again. |
| |
| ``rename_lock`` is also used to detect and defend against potential attacks |
| against ``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` and ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` when resolving ".." (where |
| the parent directory is moved outside the root, bypassing the ``path_equal()`` |
| check). If ``rename_lock`` is updated during the lookup and the path encounters |
| a "..", a potential attack occurred and ``handle_dots()`` will bail out with |
| ``-EAGAIN``. |
| |
| inode->i_rwsem |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| ``i_rwsem`` is a read/write semaphore that serializes all changes to a particular |
| directory. This ensures that, for example, an ``unlink()`` and a ``rename()`` |
| cannot both happen at the same time. It also keeps the directory |
| stable while the filesystem is asked to look up a name that is not |
| currently in the dcache or, optionally, when the list of entries in a |
| directory is being retrieved with ``readdir()``. |
| |
| This has a complementary role to that of ``d_lock``: ``i_rwsem`` on a |
| directory protects all of the names in that directory, while ``d_lock`` |
| on a name protects just one name in a directory. Most changes to the |
| dcache hold ``i_rwsem`` on the relevant directory inode and briefly take |
| ``d_lock`` on one or more the dentries while the change happens. One |
| exception is when idle dentries are removed from the dcache due to |
| memory pressure. This uses ``d_lock``, but ``i_rwsem`` plays no role. |
| |
| The semaphore affects pathname lookup in two distinct ways. Firstly it |
| prevents changes during lookup of a name in a directory. ``walk_component()`` uses |
| ``lookup_fast()`` first which, in turn, checks to see if the name is in the cache, |
| using only ``d_lock`` locking. If the name isn't found, then ``walk_component()`` |
| falls back to ``lookup_slow()`` which takes a shared lock on ``i_rwsem``, checks again that |
| the name isn't in the cache, and then calls in to the filesystem to get a |
| definitive answer. A new dentry will be added to the cache regardless of |
| the result. |
| |
| Secondly, when pathname lookup reaches the final component, it will |
| sometimes need to take an exclusive lock on ``i_rwsem`` before performing the last lookup so |
| that the required exclusion can be achieved. How path lookup chooses |
| to take, or not take, ``i_rwsem`` is one of the |
| issues addressed in a subsequent section. |
| |
| If two threads attempt to look up the same name at the same time - a |
| name that is not yet in the dcache - the shared lock on ``i_rwsem`` will |
| not prevent them both adding new dentries with the same name. As this |
| would result in confusion an extra level of interlocking is used, |
| based around a secondary hash table (``in_lookup_hashtable``) and a |
| per-dentry flag bit (``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP``). |
| |
| To add a new dentry to the cache while only holding a shared lock on |
| ``i_rwsem``, a thread must call ``d_alloc_parallel()``. This allocates a |
| dentry, stores the required name and parent in it, checks if there |
| is already a matching dentry in the primary or secondary hash |
| tables, and if not, stores the newly allocated dentry in the secondary |
| hash table, with ``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP`` set. |
| |
| If a matching dentry was found in the primary hash table then that is |
| returned and the caller can know that it lost a race with some other |
| thread adding the entry. If no matching dentry is found in either |
| cache, the newly allocated dentry is returned and the caller can |
| detect this from the presence of ``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP``. In this case it |
| knows that it has won any race and now is responsible for asking the |
| filesystem to perform the lookup and find the matching inode. When |
| the lookup is complete, it must call ``d_lookup_done()`` which clears |
| the flag and does some other house keeping, including removing the |
| dentry from the secondary hash table - it will normally have been |
| added to the primary hash table already. Note that a ``struct |
| waitqueue_head`` is passed to ``d_alloc_parallel()``, and |
| ``d_lookup_done()`` must be called while this ``waitqueue_head`` is still |
| in scope. |
| |
| If a matching dentry is found in the secondary hash table, |
| ``d_alloc_parallel()`` has a little more work to do. It first waits for |
| ``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP`` to be cleared, using a wait_queue that was passed |
| to the instance of ``d_alloc_parallel()`` that won the race and that |
| will be woken by the call to ``d_lookup_done()``. It then checks to see |
| if the dentry has now been added to the primary hash table. If it |
| has, the dentry is returned and the caller just sees that it lost any |
| race. If it hasn't been added to the primary hash table, the most |
| likely explanation is that some other dentry was added instead using |
| ``d_splice_alias()``. In any case, ``d_alloc_parallel()`` repeats all the |
| look ups from the start and will normally return something from the |
| primary hash table. |
| |
| mnt->mnt_count |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| ``mnt_count`` is a per-CPU reference counter on "``mount``" structures. |
| Per-CPU here means that incrementing the count is cheap as it only |
| uses CPU-local memory, but checking if the count is zero is expensive as |
| it needs to check with every CPU. Taking a ``mnt_count`` reference |
| prevents the mount structure from disappearing as the result of regular |
| unmount operations, but does not prevent a "lazy" unmount. So holding |
| ``mnt_count`` doesn't ensure that the mount remains in the namespace and, |
| in particular, doesn't stabilize the link to the mounted-on dentry. It |
| does, however, ensure that the ``mount`` data structure remains coherent, |
| and it provides a reference to the root dentry of the mounted |
| filesystem. So a reference through ``->mnt_count`` provides a stable |
| reference to the mounted dentry, but not the mounted-on dentry. |
| |
| mount_lock |
| ~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| ``mount_lock`` is a global seqlock, a bit like ``rename_lock``. It can be used to |
| check if any change has been made to any mount points. |
| |
| While walking down the tree (away from the root) this lock is used when |
| crossing a mount point to check that the crossing was safe. That is, |
| the value in the seqlock is read, then the code finds the mount that |
| is mounted on the current directory, if there is one, and increments |
| the ``mnt_count``. Finally the value in ``mount_lock`` is checked against |
| the old value. If there is no change, then the crossing was safe. If there |
| was a change, the ``mnt_count`` is decremented and the whole process is |
| retried. |
| |
| When walking up the tree (towards the root) by following a ".." link, |
| a little more care is needed. In this case the seqlock (which |
| contains both a counter and a spinlock) is fully locked to prevent |
| any changes to any mount points while stepping up. This locking is |
| needed to stabilize the link to the mounted-on dentry, which the |
| refcount on the mount itself doesn't ensure. |
| |
| ``mount_lock`` is also used to detect and defend against potential attacks |
| against ``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` and ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` when resolving ".." (where |
| the parent directory is moved outside the root, bypassing the ``path_equal()`` |
| check). If ``mount_lock`` is updated during the lookup and the path encounters |
| a "..", a potential attack occurred and ``handle_dots()`` will bail out with |
| ``-EAGAIN``. |
| |
| RCU |
| ~~~ |
| |
| Finally the global (but extremely lightweight) RCU read lock is held |
| from time to time to ensure certain data structures don't get freed |
| unexpectedly. |
| |
| In particular it is held while scanning chains in the dcache hash |
| table, and the mount point hash table. |
| |
| Bringing it together with ``struct nameidata`` |
| ---------------------------------------------- |
| |
| .. _First edition Unix: https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V1/u2.s |
| |
| Throughout the process of walking a path, the current status is stored |
| in a ``struct nameidata``, "namei" being the traditional name - dating |
| all the way back to `First Edition Unix`_ - of the function that |
| converts a "name" to an "inode". ``struct nameidata`` contains (among |
| other fields): |
| |
| ``struct path path`` |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| A ``path`` contains a ``struct vfsmount`` (which is |
| embedded in a ``struct mount``) and a ``struct dentry``. Together these |
| record the current status of the walk. They start out referring to the |
| starting point (the current working directory, the root directory, or some other |
| directory identified by a file descriptor), and are updated on each |
| step. A reference through ``d_lockref`` and ``mnt_count`` is always |
| held. |
| |
| ``struct qstr last`` |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| This is a string together with a length (i.e. *not* ``nul`` terminated) |
| that is the "next" component in the pathname. |
| |
| ``int last_type`` |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| This is one of ``LAST_NORM``, ``LAST_ROOT``, ``LAST_DOT`` or ``LAST_DOTDOT``. |
| The ``last`` field is only valid if the type is ``LAST_NORM``. |
| |
| ``struct path root`` |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| This is used to hold a reference to the effective root of the |
| filesystem. Often that reference won't be needed, so this field is |
| only assigned the first time it is used, or when a non-standard root |
| is requested. Keeping a reference in the ``nameidata`` ensures that |
| only one root is in effect for the entire path walk, even if it races |
| with a ``chroot()`` system call. |
| |
| It should be noted that in the case of ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` or |
| ``LOOKUP_BENEATH``, the effective root becomes the directory file descriptor |
| passed to ``openat2()`` (which exposes these ``LOOKUP_`` flags). |
| |
| The root is needed when either of two conditions holds: (1) either the |
| pathname or a symbolic link starts with a "'/'", or (2) a "``..``" |
| component is being handled, since "``..``" from the root must always stay |
| at the root. The value used is usually the current root directory of |
| the calling process. An alternate root can be provided as when |
| ``sysctl()`` calls ``file_open_root()``, and when NFSv4 or Btrfs call |
| ``mount_subtree()``. In each case a pathname is being looked up in a very |
| specific part of the filesystem, and the lookup must not be allowed to |
| escape that subtree. It works a bit like a local ``chroot()``. |
| |
| Ignoring the handling of symbolic links, we can now describe the |
| "``link_path_walk()``" function, which handles the lookup of everything |
| except the final component as: |
| |
| Given a path (``name``) and a nameidata structure (``nd``), check that the |
| current directory has execute permission and then advance ``name`` |
| over one component while updating ``last_type`` and ``last``. If that |
| was the final component, then return, otherwise call |
| ``walk_component()`` and repeat from the top. |
| |
| ``walk_component()`` is even easier. If the component is ``LAST_DOTS``, |
| it calls ``handle_dots()`` which does the necessary locking as already |
| described. If it finds a ``LAST_NORM`` component it first calls |
| "``lookup_fast()``" which only looks in the dcache, but will ask the |
| filesystem to revalidate the result if it is that sort of filesystem. |
| If that doesn't get a good result, it calls "``lookup_slow()``" which |
| takes ``i_rwsem``, rechecks the cache, and then asks the filesystem |
| to find a definitive answer. Each of these will call |
| ``follow_managed()`` (as described below) to handle any mount points. |
| |
| In the absence of symbolic links, ``walk_component()`` creates a new |
| ``struct path`` containing a counted reference to the new dentry and a |
| reference to the new ``vfsmount`` which is only counted if it is |
| different from the previous ``vfsmount``. It then calls |
| ``path_to_nameidata()`` to install the new ``struct path`` in the |
| ``struct nameidata`` and drop the unneeded references. |
| |
| This "hand-over-hand" sequencing of getting a reference to the new |
| dentry before dropping the reference to the previous dentry may |
| seem obvious, but is worth pointing out so that we will recognize its |
| analogue in the "RCU-walk" version. |
| |
| Handling the final component |
| ---------------------------- |
| |
| ``link_path_walk()`` only walks as far as setting ``nd->last`` and |
| ``nd->last_type`` to refer to the final component of the path. It does |
| not call ``walk_component()`` that last time. Handling that final |
| component remains for the caller to sort out. Those callers are |
| ``path_lookupat()``, ``path_parentat()``, ``path_mountpoint()`` and |
| ``path_openat()`` each of which handles the differing requirements of |
| different system calls. |
| |
| ``path_parentat()`` is clearly the simplest - it just wraps a little bit |
| of housekeeping around ``link_path_walk()`` and returns the parent |
| directory and final component to the caller. The caller will be either |
| aiming to create a name (via ``filename_create()``) or remove or rename |
| a name (in which case ``user_path_parent()`` is used). They will use |
| ``i_rwsem`` to exclude other changes while they validate and then |
| perform their operation. |
| |
| ``path_lookupat()`` is nearly as simple - it is used when an existing |
| object is wanted such as by ``stat()`` or ``chmod()``. It essentially just |
| calls ``walk_component()`` on the final component through a call to |
| ``lookup_last()``. ``path_lookupat()`` returns just the final dentry. |
| |
| ``path_mountpoint()`` handles the special case of unmounting which must |
| not try to revalidate the mounted filesystem. It effectively |
| contains, through a call to ``mountpoint_last()``, an alternate |
| implementation of ``lookup_slow()`` which skips that step. This is |
| important when unmounting a filesystem that is inaccessible, such as |
| one provided by a dead NFS server. |
| |
| Finally ``path_openat()`` is used for the ``open()`` system call; it |
| contains, in support functions starting with "``do_last()``", all the |
| complexity needed to handle the different subtleties of O_CREAT (with |
| or without O_EXCL), final "``/``" characters, and trailing symbolic |
| links. We will revisit this in the final part of this series, which |
| focuses on those symbolic links. "``do_last()``" will sometimes, but |
| not always, take ``i_rwsem``, depending on what it finds. |
| |
| Each of these, or the functions which call them, need to be alert to |
| the possibility that the final component is not ``LAST_NORM``. If the |
| goal of the lookup is to create something, then any value for |
| ``last_type`` other than ``LAST_NORM`` will result in an error. For |
| example if ``path_parentat()`` reports ``LAST_DOTDOT``, then the caller |
| won't try to create that name. They also check for trailing slashes |
| by testing ``last.name[last.len]``. If there is any character beyond |
| the final component, it must be a trailing slash. |
| |
| Revalidation and automounts |
| --------------------------- |
| |
| Apart from symbolic links, there are only two parts of the "REF-walk" |
| process not yet covered. One is the handling of stale cache entries |
| and the other is automounts. |
| |
| On filesystems that require it, the lookup routines will call the |
| ``->d_revalidate()`` dentry method to ensure that the cached information |
| is current. This will often confirm validity or update a few details |
| from a server. In some cases it may find that there has been change |
| further up the path and that something that was thought to be valid |
| previously isn't really. When this happens the lookup of the whole |
| path is aborted and retried with the "``LOOKUP_REVAL``" flag set. This |
| forces revalidation to be more thorough. We will see more details of |
| this retry process in the next article. |
| |
| Automount points are locations in the filesystem where an attempt to |
| lookup a name can trigger changes to how that lookup should be |
| handled, in particular by mounting a filesystem there. These are |
| covered in greater detail in autofs.txt in the Linux documentation |
| tree, but a few notes specifically related to path lookup are in order |
| here. |
| |
| The Linux VFS has a concept of "managed" dentries which is reflected |
| in function names such as "``follow_managed()``". There are three |
| potentially interesting things about these dentries corresponding |
| to three different flags that might be set in ``dentry->d_flags``: |
| |
| ``DCACHE_MANAGE_TRANSIT`` |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| If this flag has been set, then the filesystem has requested that the |
| ``d_manage()`` dentry operation be called before handling any possible |
| mount point. This can perform two particular services: |
| |
| It can block to avoid races. If an automount point is being |
| unmounted, the ``d_manage()`` function will usually wait for that |
| process to complete before letting the new lookup proceed and possibly |
| trigger a new automount. |
| |
| It can selectively allow only some processes to transit through a |
| mount point. When a server process is managing automounts, it may |
| need to access a directory without triggering normal automount |
| processing. That server process can identify itself to the ``autofs`` |
| filesystem, which will then give it a special pass through |
| ``d_manage()`` by returning ``-EISDIR``. |
| |
| ``DCACHE_MOUNTED`` |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| This flag is set on every dentry that is mounted on. As Linux |
| supports multiple filesystem namespaces, it is possible that the |
| dentry may not be mounted on in *this* namespace, just in some |
| other. So this flag is seen as a hint, not a promise. |
| |
| If this flag is set, and ``d_manage()`` didn't return ``-EISDIR``, |
| ``lookup_mnt()`` is called to examine the mount hash table (honoring the |
| ``mount_lock`` described earlier) and possibly return a new ``vfsmount`` |
| and a new ``dentry`` (both with counted references). |
| |
| ``DCACHE_NEED_AUTOMOUNT`` |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| If ``d_manage()`` allowed us to get this far, and ``lookup_mnt()`` didn't |
| find a mount point, then this flag causes the ``d_automount()`` dentry |
| operation to be called. |
| |
| The ``d_automount()`` operation can be arbitrarily complex and may |
| communicate with server processes etc. but it should ultimately either |
| report that there was an error, that there was nothing to mount, or |
| should provide an updated ``struct path`` with new ``dentry`` and ``vfsmount``. |
| |
| In the latter case, ``finish_automount()`` will be called to safely |
| install the new mount point into the mount table. |
| |
| There is no new locking of import here and it is important that no |
| locks (only counted references) are held over this processing due to |
| the very real possibility of extended delays. |
| This will become more important next time when we examine RCU-walk |
| which is particularly sensitive to delays. |
| |
| RCU-walk - faster pathname lookup in Linux |
| ========================================== |
| |
| RCU-walk is another algorithm for performing pathname lookup in Linux. |
| It is in many ways similar to REF-walk and the two share quite a bit |
| of code. The significant difference in RCU-walk is how it allows for |
| the possibility of concurrent access. |
| |
| We noted that REF-walk is complex because there are numerous details |
| and special cases. RCU-walk reduces this complexity by simply |
| refusing to handle a number of cases -- it instead falls back to |
| REF-walk. The difficulty with RCU-walk comes from a different |
| direction: unfamiliarity. The locking rules when depending on RCU are |
| quite different from traditional locking, so we will spend a little extra |
| time when we come to those. |
| |
| Clear demarcation of roles |
| -------------------------- |
| |
| The easiest way to manage concurrency is to forcibly stop any other |
| thread from changing the data structures that a given thread is |
| looking at. In cases where no other thread would even think of |
| changing the data and lots of different threads want to read at the |
| same time, this can be very costly. Even when using locks that permit |
| multiple concurrent readers, the simple act of updating the count of |
| the number of current readers can impose an unwanted cost. So the |
| goal when reading a shared data structure that no other process is |
| changing is to avoid writing anything to memory at all. Take no |
| locks, increment no counts, leave no footprints. |
| |
| The REF-walk mechanism already described certainly doesn't follow this |
| principle, but then it is really designed to work when there may well |
| be other threads modifying the data. RCU-walk, in contrast, is |
| designed for the common situation where there are lots of frequent |
| readers and only occasional writers. This may not be common in all |
| parts of the filesystem tree, but in many parts it will be. For the |
| other parts it is important that RCU-walk can quickly fall back to |
| using REF-walk. |
| |
| Pathname lookup always starts in RCU-walk mode but only remains there |
| as long as what it is looking for is in the cache and is stable. It |
| dances lightly down the cached filesystem image, leaving no footprints |
| and carefully watching where it is, to be sure it doesn't trip. If it |
| notices that something has changed or is changing, or if something |
| isn't in the cache, then it tries to stop gracefully and switch to |
| REF-walk. |
| |
| This stopping requires getting a counted reference on the current |
| ``vfsmount`` and ``dentry``, and ensuring that these are still valid - |
| that a path walk with REF-walk would have found the same entries. |
| This is an invariant that RCU-walk must guarantee. It can only make |
| decisions, such as selecting the next step, that are decisions which |
| REF-walk could also have made if it were walking down the tree at the |
| same time. If the graceful stop succeeds, the rest of the path is |
| processed with the reliable, if slightly sluggish, REF-walk. If |
| RCU-walk finds it cannot stop gracefully, it simply gives up and |
| restarts from the top with REF-walk. |
| |
| This pattern of "try RCU-walk, if that fails try REF-walk" can be |
| clearly seen in functions like ``filename_lookup()``, |
| ``filename_parentat()``, ``filename_mountpoint()``, |
| ``do_filp_open()``, and ``do_file_open_root()``. These five |
| correspond roughly to the four ``path_*()`` functions we met earlier, |
| each of which calls ``link_path_walk()``. The ``path_*()`` functions are |
| called using different mode flags until a mode is found which works. |
| They are first called with ``LOOKUP_RCU`` set to request "RCU-walk". If |
| that fails with the error ``ECHILD`` they are called again with no |
| special flag to request "REF-walk". If either of those report the |
| error ``ESTALE`` a final attempt is made with ``LOOKUP_REVAL`` set (and no |
| ``LOOKUP_RCU``) to ensure that entries found in the cache are forcibly |
| revalidated - normally entries are only revalidated if the filesystem |
| determines that they are too old to trust. |
| |
| The ``LOOKUP_RCU`` attempt may drop that flag internally and switch to |
| REF-walk, but will never then try to switch back to RCU-walk. Places |
| that trip up RCU-walk are much more likely to be near the leaves and |
| so it is very unlikely that there will be much, if any, benefit from |
| switching back. |
| |
| RCU and seqlocks: fast and light |
| -------------------------------- |
| |
| RCU is, unsurprisingly, critical to RCU-walk mode. The |
| ``rcu_read_lock()`` is held for the entire time that RCU-walk is walking |
| down a path. The particular guarantee it provides is that the key |
| data structures - dentries, inodes, super_blocks, and mounts - will |
| not be freed while the lock is held. They might be unlinked or |
| invalidated in one way or another, but the memory will not be |
| repurposed so values in various fields will still be meaningful. This |
| is the only guarantee that RCU provides; everything else is done using |
| seqlocks. |
| |
| As we saw above, REF-walk holds a counted reference to the current |
| dentry and the current vfsmount, and does not release those references |
| before taking references to the "next" dentry or vfsmount. It also |
| sometimes takes the ``d_lock`` spinlock. These references and locks are |
| taken to prevent certain changes from happening. RCU-walk must not |
| take those references or locks and so cannot prevent such changes. |
| Instead, it checks to see if a change has been made, and aborts or |
| retries if it has. |
| |
| To preserve the invariant mentioned above (that RCU-walk may only make |
| decisions that REF-walk could have made), it must make the checks at |
| or near the same places that REF-walk holds the references. So, when |
| REF-walk increments a reference count or takes a spinlock, RCU-walk |
| samples the status of a seqlock using ``read_seqcount_begin()`` or a |
| similar function. When REF-walk decrements the count or drops the |
| lock, RCU-walk checks if the sampled status is still valid using |
| ``read_seqcount_retry()`` or similar. |
| |
| However, there is a little bit more to seqlocks than that. If |
| RCU-walk accesses two different fields in a seqlock-protected |
| structure, or accesses the same field twice, there is no a priori |
| guarantee of any consistency between those accesses. When consistency |
| is needed - which it usually is - RCU-walk must take a copy and then |
| use ``read_seqcount_retry()`` to validate that copy. |
| |
| ``read_seqcount_retry()`` not only checks the sequence number, but also |
| imposes a memory barrier so that no memory-read instruction from |
| *before* the call can be delayed until *after* the call, either by the |
| CPU or by the compiler. A simple example of this can be seen in |
| ``slow_dentry_cmp()`` which, for filesystems which do not use simple |
| byte-wise name equality, calls into the filesystem to compare a name |
| against a dentry. The length and name pointer are copied into local |
| variables, then ``read_seqcount_retry()`` is called to confirm the two |
| are consistent, and only then is ``->d_compare()`` called. When |
| standard filename comparison is used, ``dentry_cmp()`` is called |
| instead. Notably it does *not* use ``read_seqcount_retry()``, but |
| instead has a large comment explaining why the consistency guarantee |
| isn't necessary. A subsequent ``read_seqcount_retry()`` will be |
| sufficient to catch any problem that could occur at this point. |
| |
| With that little refresher on seqlocks out of the way we can look at |
| the bigger picture of how RCU-walk uses seqlocks. |
| |
| ``mount_lock`` and ``nd->m_seq`` |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| We already met the ``mount_lock`` seqlock when REF-walk used it to |
| ensure that crossing a mount point is performed safely. RCU-walk uses |
| it for that too, but for quite a bit more. |
| |
| Instead of taking a counted reference to each ``vfsmount`` as it |
| descends the tree, RCU-walk samples the state of ``mount_lock`` at the |
| start of the walk and stores this initial sequence number in the |
| ``struct nameidata`` in the ``m_seq`` field. This one lock and one |
| sequence number are used to validate all accesses to all ``vfsmounts``, |
| and all mount point crossings. As changes to the mount table are |
| relatively rare, it is reasonable to fall back on REF-walk any time |
| that any "mount" or "unmount" happens. |
| |
| ``m_seq`` is checked (using ``read_seqretry()``) at the end of an RCU-walk |
| sequence, whether switching to REF-walk for the rest of the path or |
| when the end of the path is reached. It is also checked when stepping |
| down over a mount point (in ``__follow_mount_rcu()``) or up (in |
| ``follow_dotdot_rcu()``). If it is ever found to have changed, the |
| whole RCU-walk sequence is aborted and the path is processed again by |
| REF-walk. |
| |
| If RCU-walk finds that ``mount_lock`` hasn't changed then it can be sure |
| that, had REF-walk taken counted references on each vfsmount, the |
| results would have been the same. This ensures the invariant holds, |
| at least for vfsmount structures. |
| |
| ``dentry->d_seq`` and ``nd->seq`` |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| In place of taking a count or lock on ``d_reflock``, RCU-walk samples |
| the per-dentry ``d_seq`` seqlock, and stores the sequence number in the |
| ``seq`` field of the nameidata structure, so ``nd->seq`` should always be |
| the current sequence number of ``nd->dentry``. This number needs to be |
| revalidated after copying, and before using, the name, parent, or |
| inode of the dentry. |
| |
| The handling of the name we have already looked at, and the parent is |
| only accessed in ``follow_dotdot_rcu()`` which fairly trivially follows |
| the required pattern, though it does so for three different cases. |
| |
| When not at a mount point, ``d_parent`` is followed and its ``d_seq`` is |
| collected. When we are at a mount point, we instead follow the |
| ``mnt->mnt_mountpoint`` link to get a new dentry and collect its |
| ``d_seq``. Then, after finally finding a ``d_parent`` to follow, we must |
| check if we have landed on a mount point and, if so, must find that |
| mount point and follow the ``mnt->mnt_root`` link. This would imply a |
| somewhat unusual, but certainly possible, circumstance where the |
| starting point of the path lookup was in part of the filesystem that |
| was mounted on, and so not visible from the root. |
| |
| The inode pointer, stored in ``->d_inode``, is a little more |
| interesting. The inode will always need to be accessed at least |
| twice, once to determine if it is NULL and once to verify access |
| permissions. Symlink handling requires a validated inode pointer too. |
| Rather than revalidating on each access, a copy is made on the first |
| access and it is stored in the ``inode`` field of ``nameidata`` from where |
| it can be safely accessed without further validation. |
| |
| ``lookup_fast()`` is the only lookup routine that is used in RCU-mode, |
| ``lookup_slow()`` being too slow and requiring locks. It is in |
| ``lookup_fast()`` that we find the important "hand over hand" tracking |
| of the current dentry. |
| |
| The current ``dentry`` and current ``seq`` number are passed to |
| ``__d_lookup_rcu()`` which, on success, returns a new ``dentry`` and a |
| new ``seq`` number. ``lookup_fast()`` then copies the inode pointer and |
| revalidates the new ``seq`` number. It then validates the old ``dentry`` |
| with the old ``seq`` number one last time and only then continues. This |
| process of getting the ``seq`` number of the new dentry and then |
| checking the ``seq`` number of the old exactly mirrors the process of |
| getting a counted reference to the new dentry before dropping that for |
| the old dentry which we saw in REF-walk. |
| |
| No ``inode->i_rwsem`` or even ``rename_lock`` |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| A semaphore is a fairly heavyweight lock that can only be taken when it is |
| permissible to sleep. As ``rcu_read_lock()`` forbids sleeping, |
| ``inode->i_rwsem`` plays no role in RCU-walk. If some other thread does |
| take ``i_rwsem`` and modifies the directory in a way that RCU-walk needs |
| to notice, the result will be either that RCU-walk fails to find the |
| dentry that it is looking for, or it will find a dentry which |
| ``read_seqretry()`` won't validate. In either case it will drop down to |
| REF-walk mode which can take whatever locks are needed. |
| |
| Though ``rename_lock`` could be used by RCU-walk as it doesn't require |
| any sleeping, RCU-walk doesn't bother. REF-walk uses ``rename_lock`` to |
| protect against the possibility of hash chains in the dcache changing |
| while they are being searched. This can result in failing to find |
| something that actually is there. When RCU-walk fails to find |
| something in the dentry cache, whether it is really there or not, it |
| already drops down to REF-walk and tries again with appropriate |
| locking. This neatly handles all cases, so adding extra checks on |
| rename_lock would bring no significant value. |
| |
| ``unlazy walk()`` and ``complete_walk()`` |
| ----------------------------------------- |
| |
| That "dropping down to REF-walk" typically involves a call to |
| ``unlazy_walk()``, so named because "RCU-walk" is also sometimes |
| referred to as "lazy walk". ``unlazy_walk()`` is called when |
| following the path down to the current vfsmount/dentry pair seems to |
| have proceeded successfully, but the next step is problematic. This |
| can happen if the next name cannot be found in the dcache, if |
| permission checking or name revalidation couldn't be achieved while |
| the ``rcu_read_lock()`` is held (which forbids sleeping), if an |
| automount point is found, or in a couple of cases involving symlinks. |
| It is also called from ``complete_walk()`` when the lookup has reached |
| the final component, or the very end of the path, depending on which |
| particular flavor of lookup is used. |
| |
| Other reasons for dropping out of RCU-walk that do not trigger a call |
| to ``unlazy_walk()`` are when some inconsistency is found that cannot be |
| handled immediately, such as ``mount_lock`` or one of the ``d_seq`` |
| seqlocks reporting a change. In these cases the relevant function |
| will return ``-ECHILD`` which will percolate up until it triggers a new |
| attempt from the top using REF-walk. |
| |
| For those cases where ``unlazy_walk()`` is an option, it essentially |
| takes a reference on each of the pointers that it holds (vfsmount, |
| dentry, and possibly some symbolic links) and then verifies that the |
| relevant seqlocks have not been changed. If there have been changes, |
| it, too, aborts with ``-ECHILD``, otherwise the transition to REF-walk |
| has been a success and the lookup process continues. |
| |
| Taking a reference on those pointers is not quite as simple as just |
| incrementing a counter. That works to take a second reference if you |
| already have one (often indirectly through another object), but it |
| isn't sufficient if you don't actually have a counted reference at |
| all. For ``dentry->d_lockref``, it is safe to increment the reference |
| counter to get a reference unless it has been explicitly marked as |
| "dead" which involves setting the counter to ``-128``. |
| ``lockref_get_not_dead()`` achieves this. |
| |
| For ``mnt->mnt_count`` it is safe to take a reference as long as |
| ``mount_lock`` is then used to validate the reference. If that |
| validation fails, it may *not* be safe to just drop that reference in |
| the standard way of calling ``mnt_put()`` - an unmount may have |
| progressed too far. So the code in ``legitimize_mnt()``, when it |
| finds that the reference it got might not be safe, checks the |
| ``MNT_SYNC_UMOUNT`` flag to determine if a simple ``mnt_put()`` is |
| correct, or if it should just decrement the count and pretend none of |
| this ever happened. |
| |
| Taking care in filesystems |
| -------------------------- |
| |
| RCU-walk depends almost entirely on cached information and often will |
| not call into the filesystem at all. However there are two places, |
| besides the already-mentioned component-name comparison, where the |
| file system might be included in RCU-walk, and it must know to be |
| careful. |
| |
| If the filesystem has non-standard permission-checking requirements - |
| such as a networked filesystem which may need to check with the server |
| - the ``i_op->permission`` interface might be called during RCU-walk. |
| In this case an extra "``MAY_NOT_BLOCK``" flag is passed so that it |
| knows not to sleep, but to return ``-ECHILD`` if it cannot complete |
| promptly. ``i_op->permission`` is given the inode pointer, not the |
| dentry, so it doesn't need to worry about further consistency checks. |
| However if it accesses any other filesystem data structures, it must |
| ensure they are safe to be accessed with only the ``rcu_read_lock()`` |
| held. This typically means they must be freed using ``kfree_rcu()`` or |
| similar. |
| |
| .. _READ_ONCE: https://lwn.net/Articles/624126/ |
| |
| If the filesystem may need to revalidate dcache entries, then |
| ``d_op->d_revalidate`` may be called in RCU-walk too. This interface |
| *is* passed the dentry but does not have access to the ``inode`` or the |
| ``seq`` number from the ``nameidata``, so it needs to be extra careful |
| when accessing fields in the dentry. This "extra care" typically |
| involves using `READ_ONCE() <READ_ONCE_>`_ to access fields, and verifying the |
| result is not NULL before using it. This pattern can be seen in |
| ``nfs_lookup_revalidate()``. |
| |
| A pair of patterns |
| ------------------ |
| |
| In various places in the details of REF-walk and RCU-walk, and also in |
| the big picture, there are a couple of related patterns that are worth |
| being aware of. |
| |
| The first is "try quickly and check, if that fails try slowly". We |
| can see that in the high-level approach of first trying RCU-walk and |
| then trying REF-walk, and in places where ``unlazy_walk()`` is used to |
| switch to REF-walk for the rest of the path. We also saw it earlier |
| in ``dget_parent()`` when following a "``..``" link. It tries a quick way |
| to get a reference, then falls back to taking locks if needed. |
| |
| The second pattern is "try quickly and check, if that fails try |
| again - repeatedly". This is seen with the use of ``rename_lock`` and |
| ``mount_lock`` in REF-walk. RCU-walk doesn't make use of this pattern - |
| if anything goes wrong it is much safer to just abort and try a more |
| sedate approach. |
| |
| The emphasis here is "try quickly and check". It should probably be |
| "try quickly *and carefully*, then check". The fact that checking is |
| needed is a reminder that the system is dynamic and only a limited |
| number of things are safe at all. The most likely cause of errors in |
| this whole process is assuming something is safe when in reality it |
| isn't. Careful consideration of what exactly guarantees the safety of |
| each access is sometimes necessary. |
| |
| A walk among the symlinks |
| ========================= |
| |
| There are several basic issues that we will examine to understand the |
| handling of symbolic links: the symlink stack, together with cache |
| lifetimes, will help us understand the overall recursive handling of |
| symlinks and lead to the special care needed for the final component. |
| Then a consideration of access-time updates and summary of the various |
| flags controlling lookup will finish the story. |
| |
| The symlink stack |
| ----------------- |
| |
| There are only two sorts of filesystem objects that can usefully |
| appear in a path prior to the final component: directories and symlinks. |
| Handling directories is quite straightforward: the new directory |
| simply becomes the starting point at which to interpret the next |
| component on the path. Handling symbolic links requires a bit more |
| work. |
| |
| Conceptually, symbolic links could be handled by editing the path. If |
| a component name refers to a symbolic link, then that component is |
| replaced by the body of the link and, if that body starts with a '/', |
| then all preceding parts of the path are discarded. This is what the |
| "``readlink -f``" command does, though it also edits out "``.``" and |
| "``..``" components. |
| |
| Directly editing the path string is not really necessary when looking |
| up a path, and discarding early components is pointless as they aren't |
| looked at anyway. Keeping track of all remaining components is |
| important, but they can of course be kept separately; there is no need |
| to concatenate them. As one symlink may easily refer to another, |
| which in turn can refer to a third, we may need to keep the remaining |
| components of several paths, each to be processed when the preceding |
| ones are completed. These path remnants are kept on a stack of |
| limited size. |
| |
| There are two reasons for placing limits on how many symlinks can |
| occur in a single path lookup. The most obvious is to avoid loops. |
| If a symlink referred to itself either directly or through |
| intermediaries, then following the symlink can never complete |
| successfully - the error ``ELOOP`` must be returned. Loops can be |
| detected without imposing limits, but limits are the simplest solution |
| and, given the second reason for restriction, quite sufficient. |
| |
| .. _outlined recently: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1934390/focus=1934550 |
| |
| The second reason was `outlined recently`_ by Linus: |
| |
| Because it's a latency and DoS issue too. We need to react well to |
| true loops, but also to "very deep" non-loops. It's not about memory |
| use, it's about users triggering unreasonable CPU resources. |
| |
| Linux imposes a limit on the length of any pathname: ``PATH_MAX``, which |
| is 4096. There are a number of reasons for this limit; not letting the |
| kernel spend too much time on just one path is one of them. With |
| symbolic links you can effectively generate much longer paths so some |
| sort of limit is needed for the same reason. Linux imposes a limit of |
| at most 40 symlinks in any one path lookup. It previously imposed a |
| further limit of eight on the maximum depth of recursion, but that was |
| raised to 40 when a separate stack was implemented, so there is now |
| just the one limit. |
| |
| The ``nameidata`` structure that we met in an earlier article contains a |
| small stack that can be used to store the remaining part of up to two |
| symlinks. In many cases this will be sufficient. If it isn't, a |
| separate stack is allocated with room for 40 symlinks. Pathname |
| lookup will never exceed that stack as, once the 40th symlink is |
| detected, an error is returned. |
| |
| It might seem that the name remnants are all that needs to be stored on |
| this stack, but we need a bit more. To see that, we need to move on to |
| cache lifetimes. |
| |
| Storage and lifetime of cached symlinks |
| --------------------------------------- |
| |
| Like other filesystem resources, such as inodes and directory |
| entries, symlinks are cached by Linux to avoid repeated costly access |
| to external storage. It is particularly important for RCU-walk to be |
| able to find and temporarily hold onto these cached entries, so that |
| it doesn't need to drop down into REF-walk. |
| |
| .. _object-oriented design pattern: https://lwn.net/Articles/446317/ |
| |
| While each filesystem is free to make its own choice, symlinks are |
| typically stored in one of two places. Short symlinks are often |
| stored directly in the inode. When a filesystem allocates a ``struct |
| inode`` it typically allocates extra space to store private data (a |
| common `object-oriented design pattern`_ in the kernel). This will |
| sometimes include space for a symlink. The other common location is |
| in the page cache, which normally stores the content of files. The |
| pathname in a symlink can be seen as the content of that symlink and |
| can easily be stored in the page cache just like file content. |
| |
| When neither of these is suitable, the next most likely scenario is |
| that the filesystem will allocate some temporary memory and copy or |
| construct the symlink content into that memory whenever it is needed. |
| |
| When the symlink is stored in the inode, it has the same lifetime as |
| the inode which, itself, is protected by RCU or by a counted reference |
| on the dentry. This means that the mechanisms that pathname lookup |
| uses to access the dcache and icache (inode cache) safely are quite |
| sufficient for accessing some cached symlinks safely. In these cases, |
| the ``i_link`` pointer in the inode is set to point to wherever the |
| symlink is stored and it can be accessed directly whenever needed. |
| |
| When the symlink is stored in the page cache or elsewhere, the |
| situation is not so straightforward. A reference on a dentry or even |
| on an inode does not imply any reference on cached pages of that |
| inode, and even an ``rcu_read_lock()`` is not sufficient to ensure that |
| a page will not disappear. So for these symlinks the pathname lookup |
| code needs to ask the filesystem to provide a stable reference and, |
| significantly, needs to release that reference when it is finished |
| with it. |
| |
| Taking a reference to a cache page is often possible even in RCU-walk |
| mode. It does require making changes to memory, which is best avoided, |
| but that isn't necessarily a big cost and it is better than dropping |
| out of RCU-walk mode completely. Even filesystems that allocate |
| space to copy the symlink into can use ``GFP_ATOMIC`` to often successfully |
| allocate memory without the need to drop out of RCU-walk. If a |
| filesystem cannot successfully get a reference in RCU-walk mode, it |
| must return ``-ECHILD`` and ``unlazy_walk()`` will be called to return to |
| REF-walk mode in which the filesystem is allowed to sleep. |
| |
| The place for all this to happen is the ``i_op->follow_link()`` inode |
| method. In the present mainline code this is never actually called in |
| RCU-walk mode as the rewrite is not quite complete. It is likely that |
| in a future release this method will be passed an ``inode`` pointer when |
| called in RCU-walk mode so it both (1) knows to be careful, and (2) has the |
| validated pointer. Much like the ``i_op->permission()`` method we |
| looked at previously, ``->follow_link()`` would need to be careful that |
| all the data structures it references are safe to be accessed while |
| holding no counted reference, only the RCU lock. Though getting a |
| reference with ``->follow_link()`` is not yet done in RCU-walk mode, the |
| code is ready to release the reference when that does happen. |
| |
| This need to drop the reference to a symlink adds significant |
| complexity. It requires a reference to the inode so that the |
| ``i_op->put_link()`` inode operation can be called. In REF-walk, that |
| reference is kept implicitly through a reference to the dentry, so |
| keeping the ``struct path`` of the symlink is easiest. For RCU-walk, |
| the pointer to the inode is kept separately. To allow switching from |
| RCU-walk back to REF-walk in the middle of processing nested symlinks |
| we also need the seq number for the dentry so we can confirm that |
| switching back was safe. |
| |
| Finally, when providing a reference to a symlink, the filesystem also |
| provides an opaque "cookie" that must be passed to ``->put_link()`` so that it |
| knows what to free. This might be the allocated memory area, or a |
| pointer to the ``struct page`` in the page cache, or something else |
| completely. Only the filesystem knows what it is. |
| |
| In order for the reference to each symlink to be dropped when the walk completes, |
| whether in RCU-walk or REF-walk, the symlink stack needs to contain, |
| along with the path remnants: |
| |
| - the ``struct path`` to provide a reference to the inode in REF-walk |
| - the ``struct inode *`` to provide a reference to the inode in RCU-walk |
| - the ``seq`` to allow the path to be safely switched from RCU-walk to REF-walk |
| - the ``cookie`` that tells ``->put_path()`` what to put. |
| |
| This means that each entry in the symlink stack needs to hold five |
| pointers and an integer instead of just one pointer (the path |
| remnant). On a 64-bit system, this is about 40 bytes per entry; |
| with 40 entries it adds up to 1600 bytes total, which is less than |
| half a page. So it might seem like a lot, but is by no means |
| excessive. |
| |
| Note that, in a given stack frame, the path remnant (``name``) is not |
| part of the symlink that the other fields refer to. It is the remnant |
| to be followed once that symlink has been fully parsed. |
| |
| Following the symlink |
| --------------------- |
| |
| The main loop in ``link_path_walk()`` iterates seamlessly over all |
| components in the path and all of the non-final symlinks. As symlinks |
| are processed, the ``name`` pointer is adjusted to point to a new |
| symlink, or is restored from the stack, so that much of the loop |
| doesn't need to notice. Getting this ``name`` variable on and off the |
| stack is very straightforward; pushing and popping the references is |
| a little more complex. |
| |
| When a symlink is found, ``walk_component()`` returns the value ``1`` |
| (``0`` is returned for any other sort of success, and a negative number |
| is, as usual, an error indicator). This causes ``get_link()`` to be |
| called; it then gets the link from the filesystem. Providing that |
| operation is successful, the old path ``name`` is placed on the stack, |
| and the new value is used as the ``name`` for a while. When the end of |
| the path is found (i.e. ``*name`` is ``'\0'``) the old ``name`` is restored |
| off the stack and path walking continues. |
| |
| Pushing and popping the reference pointers (inode, cookie, etc.) is more |
| complex in part because of the desire to handle tail recursion. When |
| the last component of a symlink itself points to a symlink, we |
| want to pop the symlink-just-completed off the stack before pushing |
| the symlink-just-found to avoid leaving empty path remnants that would |
| just get in the way. |
| |
| It is most convenient to push the new symlink references onto the |
| stack in ``walk_component()`` immediately when the symlink is found; |
| ``walk_component()`` is also the last piece of code that needs to look at the |
| old symlink as it walks that last component. So it is quite |
| convenient for ``walk_component()`` to release the old symlink and pop |
| the references just before pushing the reference information for the |
| new symlink. It is guided in this by two flags; ``WALK_GET``, which |
| gives it permission to follow a symlink if it finds one, and |
| ``WALK_PUT``, which tells it to release the current symlink after it has been |
| followed. ``WALK_PUT`` is tested first, leading to a call to |
| ``put_link()``. ``WALK_GET`` is tested subsequently (by |
| ``should_follow_link()``) leading to a call to ``pick_link()`` which sets |
| up the stack frame. |
| |
| Symlinks with no final component |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| A pair of special-case symlinks deserve a little further explanation. |
| Both result in a new ``struct path`` (with mount and dentry) being set |
| up in the ``nameidata``, and result in ``get_link()`` returning ``NULL``. |
| |
| The more obvious case is a symlink to "``/``". All symlinks starting |
| with "``/``" are detected in ``get_link()`` which resets the ``nameidata`` |
| to point to the effective filesystem root. If the symlink only |
| contains "``/``" then there is nothing more to do, no components at all, |
| so ``NULL`` is returned to indicate that the symlink can be released and |
| the stack frame discarded. |
| |
| The other case involves things in ``/proc`` that look like symlinks but |
| aren't really (and are therefore commonly referred to as "magic-links"):: |
| |
| $ ls -l /proc/self/fd/1 |
| lrwx------ 1 neilb neilb 64 Jun 13 10:19 /proc/self/fd/1 -> /dev/pts/4 |
| |
| Every open file descriptor in any process is represented in ``/proc`` by |
| something that looks like a symlink. It is really a reference to the |
| target file, not just the name of it. When you ``readlink`` these |
| objects you get a name that might refer to the same file - unless it |
| has been unlinked or mounted over. When ``walk_component()`` follows |
| one of these, the ``->follow_link()`` method in "procfs" doesn't return |
| a string name, but instead calls ``nd_jump_link()`` which updates the |
| ``nameidata`` in place to point to that target. ``->follow_link()`` then |
| returns ``NULL``. Again there is no final component and ``get_link()`` |
| reports this by leaving the ``last_type`` field of ``nameidata`` as |
| ``LAST_BIND``. |
| |
| Following the symlink in the final component |
| -------------------------------------------- |
| |
| All this leads to ``link_path_walk()`` walking down every component, and |
| following all symbolic links it finds, until it reaches the final |
| component. This is just returned in the ``last`` field of ``nameidata``. |
| For some callers, this is all they need; they want to create that |
| ``last`` name if it doesn't exist or give an error if it does. Other |
| callers will want to follow a symlink if one is found, and possibly |
| apply special handling to the last component of that symlink, rather |
| than just the last component of the original file name. These callers |
| potentially need to call ``link_path_walk()`` again and again on |
| successive symlinks until one is found that doesn't point to another |
| symlink. |
| |
| This case is handled by the relevant caller of ``link_path_walk()``, such as |
| ``path_lookupat()`` using a loop that calls ``link_path_walk()``, and then |
| handles the final component. If the final component is a symlink |
| that needs to be followed, then ``trailing_symlink()`` is called to set |
| things up properly and the loop repeats, calling ``link_path_walk()`` |
| again. This could loop as many as 40 times if the last component of |
| each symlink is another symlink. |
| |
| The various functions that examine the final component and possibly |
| report that it is a symlink are ``lookup_last()``, ``mountpoint_last()`` |
| and ``do_last()``, each of which use the same convention as |
| ``walk_component()`` of returning ``1`` if a symlink was found that needs |
| to be followed. |
| |
| Of these, ``do_last()`` is the most interesting as it is used for |
| opening a file. Part of ``do_last()`` runs with ``i_rwsem`` held and this |
| part is in a separate function: ``lookup_open()``. |
| |
| Explaining ``do_last()`` completely is beyond the scope of this article, |
| but a few highlights should help those interested in exploring the |
| code. |
| |
| 1. Rather than just finding the target file, ``do_last()`` needs to open |
| it. If the file was found in the dcache, then ``vfs_open()`` is used for |
| this. If not, then ``lookup_open()`` will either call ``atomic_open()`` (if |
| the filesystem provides it) to combine the final lookup with the open, or |
| will perform the separate ``lookup_real()`` and ``vfs_create()`` steps |
| directly. In the later case the actual "open" of this newly found or |
| created file will be performed by ``vfs_open()``, just as if the name |
| were found in the dcache. |
| |
| 2. ``vfs_open()`` can fail with ``-EOPENSTALE`` if the cached information |
| wasn't quite current enough. Rather than restarting the lookup from |
| the top with ``LOOKUP_REVAL`` set, ``lookup_open()`` is called instead, |
| giving the filesystem a chance to resolve small inconsistencies. |
| If that doesn't work, only then is the lookup restarted from the top. |
| |
| 3. An open with O_CREAT **does** follow a symlink in the final component, |
| unlike other creation system calls (like ``mkdir``). So the sequence:: |
| |
| ln -s bar /tmp/foo |
| echo hello > /tmp/foo |
| |
| will create a file called ``/tmp/bar``. This is not permitted if |
| ``O_EXCL`` is set but otherwise is handled for an O_CREAT open much |
| like for a non-creating open: ``should_follow_link()`` returns ``1``, and |
| so does ``do_last()`` so that ``trailing_symlink()`` gets called and the |
| open process continues on the symlink that was found. |
| |
| Updating the access time |
| ------------------------ |
| |
| We previously said of RCU-walk that it would "take no locks, increment |
| no counts, leave no footprints." We have since seen that some |
| "footprints" can be needed when handling symlinks as a counted |
| reference (or even a memory allocation) may be needed. But these |
| footprints are best kept to a minimum. |
| |
| One other place where walking down a symlink can involve leaving |
| footprints in a way that doesn't affect directories is in updating access times. |
| In Unix (and Linux) every filesystem object has a "last accessed |
| time", or "``atime``". Passing through a directory to access a file |
| within is not considered to be an access for the purposes of |
| ``atime``; only listing the contents of a directory can update its ``atime``. |
| Symlinks are different it seems. Both reading a symlink (with ``readlink()``) |
| and looking up a symlink on the way to some other destination can |
| update the atime on that symlink. |
| |
| .. _clearest statement: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_08 |
| |
| It is not clear why this is the case; POSIX has little to say on the |
| subject. The `clearest statement`_ is that, if a particular implementation |
| updates a timestamp in a place not specified by POSIX, this must be |
| documented "except that any changes caused by pathname resolution need |
| not be documented". This seems to imply that POSIX doesn't really |
| care about access-time updates during pathname lookup. |
| |
| .. _Linux 1.3.87: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/history/history.git/diff/fs/ext2/symlink.c?id=f806c6db77b8eaa6e00dcfb6b567706feae8dbb8 |
| |
| An examination of history shows that prior to `Linux 1.3.87`_, the ext2 |
| filesystem, at least, didn't update atime when following a link. |
| Unfortunately we have no record of why that behavior was changed. |
| |
| In any case, access time must now be updated and that operation can be |
| quite complex. Trying to stay in RCU-walk while doing it is best |
| avoided. Fortunately it is often permitted to skip the ``atime`` |
| update. Because ``atime`` updates cause performance problems in various |
| areas, Linux supports the ``relatime`` mount option, which generally |
| limits the updates of ``atime`` to once per day on files that aren't |
| being changed (and symlinks never change once created). Even without |
| ``relatime``, many filesystems record ``atime`` with a one-second |
| granularity, so only one update per second is required. |
| |
| It is easy to test if an ``atime`` update is needed while in RCU-walk |
| mode and, if it isn't, the update can be skipped and RCU-walk mode |
| continues. Only when an ``atime`` update is actually required does the |
| path walk drop down to REF-walk. All of this is handled in the |
| ``get_link()`` function. |
| |
| A few flags |
| ----------- |
| |
| A suitable way to wrap up this tour of pathname walking is to list |
| the various flags that can be stored in the ``nameidata`` to guide the |
| lookup process. Many of these are only meaningful on the final |
| component, others reflect the current state of the pathname lookup, and some |
| apply restrictions to all path components encountered in the path lookup. |
| |
| And then there is ``LOOKUP_EMPTY``, which doesn't fit conceptually with |
| the others. If this is not set, an empty pathname causes an error |
| very early on. If it is set, empty pathnames are not considered to be |
| an error. |
| |
| Global state flags |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| We have already met two global state flags: ``LOOKUP_RCU`` and |
| ``LOOKUP_REVAL``. These select between one of three overall approaches |
| to lookup: RCU-walk, REF-walk, and REF-walk with forced revalidation. |
| |
| ``LOOKUP_PARENT`` indicates that the final component hasn't been reached |
| yet. This is primarily used to tell the audit subsystem the full |
| context of a particular access being audited. |
| |
| ``LOOKUP_ROOT`` indicates that the ``root`` field in the ``nameidata`` was |
| provided by the caller, so it shouldn't be released when it is no |
| longer needed. |
| |
| ``LOOKUP_JUMPED`` means that the current dentry was chosen not because |
| it had the right name but for some other reason. This happens when |
| following "``..``", following a symlink to ``/``, crossing a mount point |
| or accessing a "``/proc/$PID/fd/$FD``" symlink (also known as a "magic |
| link"). In this case the filesystem has not been asked to revalidate the |
| name (with ``d_revalidate()``). In such cases the inode may still need |
| to be revalidated, so ``d_op->d_weak_revalidate()`` is called if |
| ``LOOKUP_JUMPED`` is set when the look completes - which may be at the |
| final component or, when creating, unlinking, or renaming, at the penultimate component. |
| |
| Resolution-restriction flags |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| In order to allow userspace to protect itself against certain race conditions |
| and attack scenarios involving changing path components, a series of flags are |
| available which apply restrictions to all path components encountered during |
| path lookup. These flags are exposed through ``openat2()``'s ``resolve`` field. |
| |
| ``LOOKUP_NO_SYMLINKS`` blocks all symlink traversals (including magic-links). |
| This is distinctly different from ``LOOKUP_FOLLOW``, because the latter only |
| relates to restricting the following of trailing symlinks. |
| |
| ``LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS`` blocks all magic-link traversals. Filesystems must |
| ensure that they return errors from ``nd_jump_link()``, because that is how |
| ``LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS`` and other magic-link restrictions are implemented. |
| |
| ``LOOKUP_NO_XDEV`` blocks all ``vfsmount`` traversals (this includes both |
| bind-mounts and ordinary mounts). Note that the ``vfsmount`` which contains the |
| lookup is determined by the first mountpoint the path lookup reaches -- |
| absolute paths start with the ``vfsmount`` of ``/``, and relative paths start |
| with the ``dfd``'s ``vfsmount``. Magic-links are only permitted if the |
| ``vfsmount`` of the path is unchanged. |
| |
| ``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` blocks any path components which resolve outside the |
| starting point of the resolution. This is done by blocking ``nd_jump_root()`` |
| as well as blocking ".." if it would jump outside the starting point. |
| ``rename_lock`` and ``mount_lock`` are used to detect attacks against the |
| resolution of "..". Magic-links are also blocked. |
| |
| ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` resolves all path components as though the starting point |
| were the filesystem root. ``nd_jump_root()`` brings the resolution back to |
| the starting point, and ".." at the starting point will act as a no-op. As with |
| ``LOOKUP_BENEATH``, ``rename_lock`` and ``mount_lock`` are used to detect |
| attacks against ".." resolution. Magic-links are also blocked. |
| |
| Final-component flags |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Some of these flags are only set when the final component is being |
| considered. Others are only checked for when considering that final |
| component. |
| |
| ``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT`` ensures that, if the final component is an automount |
| point, then the mount is triggered. Some operations would trigger it |
| anyway, but operations like ``stat()`` deliberately don't. ``statfs()`` |
| needs to trigger the mount but otherwise behaves a lot like ``stat()``, so |
| it sets ``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT``, as does "``quotactl()``" and the handling of |
| "``mount --bind``". |
| |
| ``LOOKUP_FOLLOW`` has a similar function to ``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT`` but for |
| symlinks. Some system calls set or clear it implicitly, while |
| others have API flags such as ``AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW`` and |
| ``UMOUNT_NOFOLLOW`` to control it. Its effect is similar to |
| ``WALK_GET`` that we already met, but it is used in a different way. |
| |
| ``LOOKUP_DIRECTORY`` insists that the final component is a directory. |
| Various callers set this and it is also set when the final component |
| is found to be followed by a slash. |
| |
| Finally ``LOOKUP_OPEN``, ``LOOKUP_CREATE``, ``LOOKUP_EXCL``, and |
| ``LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET`` are not used directly by the VFS but are made |
| available to the filesystem and particularly the ``->d_revalidate()`` |
| method. A filesystem can choose not to bother revalidating too hard |
| if it knows that it will be asked to open or create the file soon. |
| These flags were previously useful for ``->lookup()`` too but with the |
| introduction of ``->atomic_open()`` they are less relevant there. |
| |
| End of the road |
| --------------- |
| |
| Despite its complexity, all this pathname lookup code appears to be |
| in good shape - various parts are certainly easier to understand now |
| than even a couple of releases ago. But that doesn't mean it is |
| "finished". As already mentioned, RCU-walk currently only follows |
| symlinks that are stored in the inode so, while it handles many ext4 |
| symlinks, it doesn't help with NFS, XFS, or Btrfs. That support |
| is not likely to be long delayed. |