| .. _mm_concepts: |
| |
| ================= |
| Concepts overview |
| ================= |
| |
| The memory management in Linux is a complex system that evolved over the |
| years and included more and more functionality to support a variety of |
| systems from MMU-less microcontrollers to supercomputers. The memory |
| management for systems without an MMU is called ``nommu`` and it |
| definitely deserves a dedicated document, which hopefully will be |
| eventually written. Yet, although some of the concepts are the same, |
| here we assume that an MMU is available and a CPU can translate a virtual |
| address to a physical address. |
| |
| .. contents:: :local: |
| |
| Virtual Memory Primer |
| ===================== |
| |
| The physical memory in a computer system is a limited resource and |
| even for systems that support memory hotplug there is a hard limit on |
| the amount of memory that can be installed. The physical memory is not |
| necessarily contiguous; it might be accessible as a set of distinct |
| address ranges. Besides, different CPU architectures, and even |
| different implementations of the same architecture have different views |
| of how these address ranges are defined. |
| |
| All this makes dealing directly with physical memory quite complex and |
| to avoid this complexity a concept of virtual memory was developed. |
| |
| The virtual memory abstracts the details of physical memory from the |
| application software, allows to keep only needed information in the |
| physical memory (demand paging) and provides a mechanism for the |
| protection and controlled sharing of data between processes. |
| |
| With virtual memory, each and every memory access uses a virtual |
| address. When the CPU decodes an instruction that reads (or |
| writes) from (or to) the system memory, it translates the `virtual` |
| address encoded in that instruction to a `physical` address that the |
| memory controller can understand. |
| |
| The physical system memory is divided into page frames, or pages. The |
| size of each page is architecture specific. Some architectures allow |
| selection of the page size from several supported values; this |
| selection is performed at the kernel build time by setting an |
| appropriate kernel configuration option. |
| |
| Each physical memory page can be mapped as one or more virtual |
| pages. These mappings are described by page tables that allow |
| translation from a virtual address used by programs to the physical |
| memory address. The page tables are organized hierarchically. |
| |
| The tables at the lowest level of the hierarchy contain physical |
| addresses of actual pages used by the software. The tables at higher |
| levels contain physical addresses of the pages belonging to the lower |
| levels. The pointer to the top level page table resides in a |
| register. When the CPU performs the address translation, it uses this |
| register to access the top level page table. The high bits of the |
| virtual address are used to index an entry in the top level page |
| table. That entry is then used to access the next level in the |
| hierarchy with the next bits of the virtual address as the index to |
| that level page table. The lowest bits in the virtual address define |
| the offset inside the actual page. |
| |
| Huge Pages |
| ========== |
| |
| The address translation requires several memory accesses and memory |
| accesses are slow relatively to CPU speed. To avoid spending precious |
| processor cycles on the address translation, CPUs maintain a cache of |
| such translations called Translation Lookaside Buffer (or |
| TLB). Usually TLB is pretty scarce resource and applications with |
| large memory working set will experience performance hit because of |
| TLB misses. |
| |
| Many modern CPU architectures allow mapping of the memory pages |
| directly by the higher levels in the page table. For instance, on x86, |
| it is possible to map 2M and even 1G pages using entries in the second |
| and the third level page tables. In Linux such pages are called |
| `huge`. Usage of huge pages significantly reduces pressure on TLB, |
| improves TLB hit-rate and thus improves overall system performance. |
| |
| There are two mechanisms in Linux that enable mapping of the physical |
| memory with the huge pages. The first one is `HugeTLB filesystem`, or |
| hugetlbfs. It is a pseudo filesystem that uses RAM as its backing |
| store. For the files created in this filesystem the data resides in |
| the memory and mapped using huge pages. The hugetlbfs is described at |
| :ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/mm/hugetlbpage.rst <hugetlbpage>`. |
| |
| Another, more recent, mechanism that enables use of the huge pages is |
| called `Transparent HugePages`, or THP. Unlike the hugetlbfs that |
| requires users and/or system administrators to configure what parts of |
| the system memory should and can be mapped by the huge pages, THP |
| manages such mappings transparently to the user and hence the |
| name. See |
| :ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst <admin_guide_transhuge>` |
| for more details about THP. |
| |
| Zones |
| ===== |
| |
| Often hardware poses restrictions on how different physical memory |
| ranges can be accessed. In some cases, devices cannot perform DMA to |
| all the addressable memory. In other cases, the size of the physical |
| memory exceeds the maximal addressable size of virtual memory and |
| special actions are required to access portions of the memory. Linux |
| groups memory pages into `zones` according to their possible |
| usage. For example, ZONE_DMA will contain memory that can be used by |
| devices for DMA, ZONE_HIGHMEM will contain memory that is not |
| permanently mapped into kernel's address space and ZONE_NORMAL will |
| contain normally addressed pages. |
| |
| The actual layout of the memory zones is hardware dependent as not all |
| architectures define all zones, and requirements for DMA are different |
| for different platforms. |
| |
| Nodes |
| ===== |
| |
| Many multi-processor machines are NUMA - Non-Uniform Memory Access - |
| systems. In such systems the memory is arranged into banks that have |
| different access latency depending on the "distance" from the |
| processor. Each bank is referred to as a `node` and for each node Linux |
| constructs an independent memory management subsystem. A node has its |
| own set of zones, lists of free and used pages and various statistics |
| counters. You can find more details about NUMA in |
| :ref:`Documentation/mm/numa.rst <numa>` and in |
| :ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numa_memory_policy.rst <numa_memory_policy>`. |
| |
| Page cache |
| ========== |
| |
| The physical memory is volatile and the common case for getting data |
| into the memory is to read it from files. Whenever a file is read, the |
| data is put into the `page cache` to avoid expensive disk access on |
| the subsequent reads. Similarly, when one writes to a file, the data |
| is placed in the page cache and eventually gets into the backing |
| storage device. The written pages are marked as `dirty` and when Linux |
| decides to reuse them for other purposes, it makes sure to synchronize |
| the file contents on the device with the updated data. |
| |
| Anonymous Memory |
| ================ |
| |
| The `anonymous memory` or `anonymous mappings` represent memory that |
| is not backed by a filesystem. Such mappings are implicitly created |
| for program's stack and heap or by explicit calls to mmap(2) system |
| call. Usually, the anonymous mappings only define virtual memory areas |
| that the program is allowed to access. The read accesses will result |
| in creation of a page table entry that references a special physical |
| page filled with zeroes. When the program performs a write, a regular |
| physical page will be allocated to hold the written data. The page |
| will be marked dirty and if the kernel decides to repurpose it, |
| the dirty page will be swapped out. |
| |
| Reclaim |
| ======= |
| |
| Throughout the system lifetime, a physical page can be used for storing |
| different types of data. It can be kernel internal data structures, |
| DMA'able buffers for device drivers use, data read from a filesystem, |
| memory allocated by user space processes etc. |
| |
| Depending on the page usage it is treated differently by the Linux |
| memory management. The pages that can be freed at any time, either |
| because they cache the data available elsewhere, for instance, on a |
| hard disk, or because they can be swapped out, again, to the hard |
| disk, are called `reclaimable`. The most notable categories of the |
| reclaimable pages are page cache and anonymous memory. |
| |
| In most cases, the pages holding internal kernel data and used as DMA |
| buffers cannot be repurposed, and they remain pinned until freed by |
| their user. Such pages are called `unreclaimable`. However, in certain |
| circumstances, even pages occupied with kernel data structures can be |
| reclaimed. For instance, in-memory caches of filesystem metadata can |
| be re-read from the storage device and therefore it is possible to |
| discard them from the main memory when system is under memory |
| pressure. |
| |
| The process of freeing the reclaimable physical memory pages and |
| repurposing them is called (surprise!) `reclaim`. Linux can reclaim |
| pages either asynchronously or synchronously, depending on the state |
| of the system. When the system is not loaded, most of the memory is free |
| and allocation requests will be satisfied immediately from the free |
| pages supply. As the load increases, the amount of the free pages goes |
| down and when it reaches a certain threshold (low watermark), an |
| allocation request will awaken the ``kswapd`` daemon. It will |
| asynchronously scan memory pages and either just free them if the data |
| they contain is available elsewhere, or evict to the backing storage |
| device (remember those dirty pages?). As memory usage increases even |
| more and reaches another threshold - min watermark - an allocation |
| will trigger `direct reclaim`. In this case allocation is stalled |
| until enough memory pages are reclaimed to satisfy the request. |
| |
| Compaction |
| ========== |
| |
| As the system runs, tasks allocate and free the memory and it becomes |
| fragmented. Although with virtual memory it is possible to present |
| scattered physical pages as virtually contiguous range, sometimes it is |
| necessary to allocate large physically contiguous memory areas. Such |
| need may arise, for instance, when a device driver requires a large |
| buffer for DMA, or when THP allocates a huge page. Memory `compaction` |
| addresses the fragmentation issue. This mechanism moves occupied pages |
| from the lower part of a memory zone to free pages in the upper part |
| of the zone. When a compaction scan is finished free pages are grouped |
| together at the beginning of the zone and allocations of large |
| physically contiguous areas become possible. |
| |
| Like reclaim, the compaction may happen asynchronously in the ``kcompactd`` |
| daemon or synchronously as a result of a memory allocation request. |
| |
| OOM killer |
| ========== |
| |
| It is possible that on a loaded machine memory will be exhausted and the |
| kernel will be unable to reclaim enough memory to continue to operate. In |
| order to save the rest of the system, it invokes the `OOM killer`. |
| |
| The `OOM killer` selects a task to sacrifice for the sake of the overall |
| system health. The selected task is killed in a hope that after it exits |
| enough memory will be freed to continue normal operation. |