| = Transparent Hugepage Support = |
| |
| == Objective == |
| |
| Performance critical computing applications dealing with large memory |
| working sets are already running on top of libhugetlbfs and in turn |
| hugetlbfs. Transparent Hugepage Support is an alternative means of |
| using huge pages for the backing of virtual memory with huge pages |
| that supports the automatic promotion and demotion of page sizes and |
| without the shortcomings of hugetlbfs. |
| |
| Currently it only works for anonymous memory mappings but in the |
| future it can expand over the pagecache layer starting with tmpfs. |
| |
| The reason applications are running faster is because of two |
| factors. The first factor is almost completely irrelevant and it's not |
| of significant interest because it'll also have the downside of |
| requiring larger clear-page copy-page in page faults which is a |
| potentially negative effect. The first factor consists in taking a |
| single page fault for each 2M virtual region touched by userland (so |
| reducing the enter/exit kernel frequency by a 512 times factor). This |
| only matters the first time the memory is accessed for the lifetime of |
| a memory mapping. The second long lasting and much more important |
| factor will affect all subsequent accesses to the memory for the whole |
| runtime of the application. The second factor consist of two |
| components: 1) the TLB miss will run faster (especially with |
| virtualization using nested pagetables but almost always also on bare |
| metal without virtualization) and 2) a single TLB entry will be |
| mapping a much larger amount of virtual memory in turn reducing the |
| number of TLB misses. With virtualization and nested pagetables the |
| TLB can be mapped of larger size only if both KVM and the Linux guest |
| are using hugepages but a significant speedup already happens if only |
| one of the two is using hugepages just because of the fact the TLB |
| miss is going to run faster. |
| |
| == Design == |
| |
| - "graceful fallback": mm components which don't have transparent hugepage |
| knowledge fall back to breaking huge pmd mapping into table of ptes and, |
| if necessary, split a transparent hugepage. Therefore these components |
| can continue working on the regular pages or regular pte mappings. |
| |
| - if a hugepage allocation fails because of memory fragmentation, |
| regular pages should be gracefully allocated instead and mixed in |
| the same vma without any failure or significant delay and without |
| userland noticing |
| |
| - if some task quits and more hugepages become available (either |
| immediately in the buddy or through the VM), guest physical memory |
| backed by regular pages should be relocated on hugepages |
| automatically (with khugepaged) |
| |
| - it doesn't require memory reservation and in turn it uses hugepages |
| whenever possible (the only possible reservation here is kernelcore= |
| to avoid unmovable pages to fragment all the memory but such a tweak |
| is not specific to transparent hugepage support and it's a generic |
| feature that applies to all dynamic high order allocations in the |
| kernel) |
| |
| - this initial support only offers the feature in the anonymous memory |
| regions but it'd be ideal to move it to tmpfs and the pagecache |
| later |
| |
| Transparent Hugepage Support maximizes the usefulness of free memory |
| if compared to the reservation approach of hugetlbfs by allowing all |
| unused memory to be used as cache or other movable (or even unmovable |
| entities). It doesn't require reservation to prevent hugepage |
| allocation failures to be noticeable from userland. It allows paging |
| and all other advanced VM features to be available on the |
| hugepages. It requires no modifications for applications to take |
| advantage of it. |
| |
| Applications however can be further optimized to take advantage of |
| this feature, like for example they've been optimized before to avoid |
| a flood of mmap system calls for every malloc(4k). Optimizing userland |
| is by far not mandatory and khugepaged already can take care of long |
| lived page allocations even for hugepage unaware applications that |
| deals with large amounts of memory. |
| |
| In certain cases when hugepages are enabled system wide, application |
| may end up allocating more memory resources. An application may mmap a |
| large region but only touch 1 byte of it, in that case a 2M page might |
| be allocated instead of a 4k page for no good. This is why it's |
| possible to disable hugepages system-wide and to only have them inside |
| MADV_HUGEPAGE madvise regions. |
| |
| Embedded systems should enable hugepages only inside madvise regions |
| to eliminate any risk of wasting any precious byte of memory and to |
| only run faster. |
| |
| Applications that gets a lot of benefit from hugepages and that don't |
| risk to lose memory by using hugepages, should use |
| madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE) on their critical mmapped regions. |
| |
| == sysfs == |
| |
| Transparent Hugepage Support can be entirely disabled (mostly for |
| debugging purposes) or only enabled inside MADV_HUGEPAGE regions (to |
| avoid the risk of consuming more memory resources) or enabled system |
| wide. This can be achieved with one of: |
| |
| echo always >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled |
| echo madvise >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled |
| echo never >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled |
| |
| It's also possible to limit defrag efforts in the VM to generate |
| hugepages in case they're not immediately free to madvise regions or |
| to never try to defrag memory and simply fallback to regular pages |
| unless hugepages are immediately available. Clearly if we spend CPU |
| time to defrag memory, we would expect to gain even more by the fact |
| we use hugepages later instead of regular pages. This isn't always |
| guaranteed, but it may be more likely in case the allocation is for a |
| MADV_HUGEPAGE region. |
| |
| echo always >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/defrag |
| echo madvise >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/defrag |
| echo never >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/defrag |
| |
| By default kernel tries to use huge zero page on read page fault. |
| It's possible to disable huge zero page by writing 0 or enable it |
| back by writing 1: |
| |
| echo 0 >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/use_zero_page |
| echo 1 >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/use_zero_page |
| |
| khugepaged will be automatically started when |
| transparent_hugepage/enabled is set to "always" or "madvise, and it'll |
| be automatically shutdown if it's set to "never". |
| |
| khugepaged runs usually at low frequency so while one may not want to |
| invoke defrag algorithms synchronously during the page faults, it |
| should be worth invoking defrag at least in khugepaged. However it's |
| also possible to disable defrag in khugepaged by writing 0 or enable |
| defrag in khugepaged by writing 1: |
| |
| echo 0 >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/defrag |
| echo 1 >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/defrag |
| |
| You can also control how many pages khugepaged should scan at each |
| pass: |
| |
| /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/pages_to_scan |
| |
| and how many milliseconds to wait in khugepaged between each pass (you |
| can set this to 0 to run khugepaged at 100% utilization of one core): |
| |
| /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/scan_sleep_millisecs |
| |
| and how many milliseconds to wait in khugepaged if there's an hugepage |
| allocation failure to throttle the next allocation attempt. |
| |
| /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/alloc_sleep_millisecs |
| |
| The khugepaged progress can be seen in the number of pages collapsed: |
| |
| /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/pages_collapsed |
| |
| for each pass: |
| |
| /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/full_scans |
| |
| max_ptes_none specifies how many extra small pages (that are |
| not already mapped) can be allocated when collapsing a group |
| of small pages into one large page. |
| |
| /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/max_ptes_none |
| |
| A higher value leads to use additional memory for programs. |
| A lower value leads to gain less thp performance. Value of |
| max_ptes_none can waste cpu time very little, you can |
| ignore it. |
| |
| max_ptes_swap specifies how many pages can be brought in from |
| swap when collapsing a group of pages into a transparent huge page. |
| |
| /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/max_ptes_swap |
| |
| A higher value can cause excessive swap IO and waste |
| memory. A lower value can prevent THPs from being |
| collapsed, resulting fewer pages being collapsed into |
| THPs, and lower memory access performance. |
| |
| == Boot parameter == |
| |
| You can change the sysfs boot time defaults of Transparent Hugepage |
| Support by passing the parameter "transparent_hugepage=always" or |
| "transparent_hugepage=madvise" or "transparent_hugepage=never" |
| (without "") to the kernel command line. |
| |
| == Need of application restart == |
| |
| The transparent_hugepage/enabled values only affect future |
| behavior. So to make them effective you need to restart any |
| application that could have been using hugepages. This also applies to |
| the regions registered in khugepaged. |
| |
| == Monitoring usage == |
| |
| The number of transparent huge pages currently used by the system is |
| available by reading the AnonHugePages field in /proc/meminfo. To |
| identify what applications are using transparent huge pages, it is |
| necessary to read /proc/PID/smaps and count the AnonHugePages fields |
| for each mapping. Note that reading the smaps file is expensive and |
| reading it frequently will incur overhead. |
| |
| There are a number of counters in /proc/vmstat that may be used to |
| monitor how successfully the system is providing huge pages for use. |
| |
| thp_fault_alloc is incremented every time a huge page is successfully |
| allocated to handle a page fault. This applies to both the |
| first time a page is faulted and for COW faults. |
| |
| thp_collapse_alloc is incremented by khugepaged when it has found |
| a range of pages to collapse into one huge page and has |
| successfully allocated a new huge page to store the data. |
| |
| thp_fault_fallback is incremented if a page fault fails to allocate |
| a huge page and instead falls back to using small pages. |
| |
| thp_collapse_alloc_failed is incremented if khugepaged found a range |
| of pages that should be collapsed into one huge page but failed |
| the allocation. |
| |
| thp_split_page is incremented every time a huge page is split into base |
| pages. This can happen for a variety of reasons but a common |
| reason is that a huge page is old and is being reclaimed. |
| This action implies splitting all PMD the page mapped with. |
| |
| thp_split_page_failed is is incremented if kernel fails to split huge |
| page. This can happen if the page was pinned by somebody. |
| |
| thp_split_pmd is incremented every time a PMD split into table of PTEs. |
| This can happen, for instance, when application calls mprotect() or |
| munmap() on part of huge page. It doesn't split huge page, only |
| page table entry. |
| |
| thp_zero_page_alloc is incremented every time a huge zero page is |
| successfully allocated. It includes allocations which where |
| dropped due race with other allocation. Note, it doesn't count |
| every map of the huge zero page, only its allocation. |
| |
| thp_zero_page_alloc_failed is incremented if kernel fails to allocate |
| huge zero page and falls back to using small pages. |
| |
| As the system ages, allocating huge pages may be expensive as the |
| system uses memory compaction to copy data around memory to free a |
| huge page for use. There are some counters in /proc/vmstat to help |
| monitor this overhead. |
| |
| compact_stall is incremented every time a process stalls to run |
| memory compaction so that a huge page is free for use. |
| |
| compact_success is incremented if the system compacted memory and |
| freed a huge page for use. |
| |
| compact_fail is incremented if the system tries to compact memory |
| but failed. |
| |
| compact_pages_moved is incremented each time a page is moved. If |
| this value is increasing rapidly, it implies that the system |
| is copying a lot of data to satisfy the huge page allocation. |
| It is possible that the cost of copying exceeds any savings |
| from reduced TLB misses. |
| |
| compact_pagemigrate_failed is incremented when the underlying mechanism |
| for moving a page failed. |
| |
| compact_blocks_moved is incremented each time memory compaction examines |
| a huge page aligned range of pages. |
| |
| It is possible to establish how long the stalls were using the function |
| tracer to record how long was spent in __alloc_pages_nodemask and |
| using the mm_page_alloc tracepoint to identify which allocations were |
| for huge pages. |
| |
| == get_user_pages and follow_page == |
| |
| get_user_pages and follow_page if run on a hugepage, will return the |
| head or tail pages as usual (exactly as they would do on |
| hugetlbfs). Most gup users will only care about the actual physical |
| address of the page and its temporary pinning to release after the I/O |
| is complete, so they won't ever notice the fact the page is huge. But |
| if any driver is going to mangle over the page structure of the tail |
| page (like for checking page->mapping or other bits that are relevant |
| for the head page and not the tail page), it should be updated to jump |
| to check head page instead. Taking reference on any head/tail page would |
| prevent page from being split by anyone. |
| |
| NOTE: these aren't new constraints to the GUP API, and they match the |
| same constrains that applies to hugetlbfs too, so any driver capable |
| of handling GUP on hugetlbfs will also work fine on transparent |
| hugepage backed mappings. |
| |
| In case you can't handle compound pages if they're returned by |
| follow_page, the FOLL_SPLIT bit can be specified as parameter to |
| follow_page, so that it will split the hugepages before returning |
| them. Migration for example passes FOLL_SPLIT as parameter to |
| follow_page because it's not hugepage aware and in fact it can't work |
| at all on hugetlbfs (but it instead works fine on transparent |
| hugepages thanks to FOLL_SPLIT). migration simply can't deal with |
| hugepages being returned (as it's not only checking the pfn of the |
| page and pinning it during the copy but it pretends to migrate the |
| memory in regular page sizes and with regular pte/pmd mappings). |
| |
| == Optimizing the applications == |
| |
| To be guaranteed that the kernel will map a 2M page immediately in any |
| memory region, the mmap region has to be hugepage naturally |
| aligned. posix_memalign() can provide that guarantee. |
| |
| == Hugetlbfs == |
| |
| You can use hugetlbfs on a kernel that has transparent hugepage |
| support enabled just fine as always. No difference can be noted in |
| hugetlbfs other than there will be less overall fragmentation. All |
| usual features belonging to hugetlbfs are preserved and |
| unaffected. libhugetlbfs will also work fine as usual. |
| |
| == Graceful fallback == |
| |
| Code walking pagetables but unware about huge pmds can simply call |
| split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, addr) where the pmd is the one returned by |
| pmd_offset. It's trivial to make the code transparent hugepage aware |
| by just grepping for "pmd_offset" and adding split_huge_pmd where |
| missing after pmd_offset returns the pmd. Thanks to the graceful |
| fallback design, with a one liner change, you can avoid to write |
| hundred if not thousand of lines of complex code to make your code |
| hugepage aware. |
| |
| If you're not walking pagetables but you run into a physical hugepage |
| but you can't handle it natively in your code, you can split it by |
| calling split_huge_page(page). This is what the Linux VM does before |
| it tries to swapout the hugepage for example. split_huge_page() can fail |
| if the page is pinned and you must handle this correctly. |
| |
| Example to make mremap.c transparent hugepage aware with a one liner |
| change: |
| |
| diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c |
| --- a/mm/mremap.c |
| +++ b/mm/mremap.c |
| @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static pmd_t *get_old_pmd(struct mm_stru |
| return NULL; |
| |
| pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr); |
| + split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, addr); |
| if (pmd_none_or_clear_bad(pmd)) |
| return NULL; |
| |
| == Locking in hugepage aware code == |
| |
| We want as much code as possible hugepage aware, as calling |
| split_huge_page() or split_huge_pmd() has a cost. |
| |
| To make pagetable walks huge pmd aware, all you need to do is to call |
| pmd_trans_huge() on the pmd returned by pmd_offset. You must hold the |
| mmap_sem in read (or write) mode to be sure an huge pmd cannot be |
| created from under you by khugepaged (khugepaged collapse_huge_page |
| takes the mmap_sem in write mode in addition to the anon_vma lock). If |
| pmd_trans_huge returns false, you just fallback in the old code |
| paths. If instead pmd_trans_huge returns true, you have to take the |
| page table lock (pmd_lock()) and re-run pmd_trans_huge. Taking the |
| page table lock will prevent the huge pmd to be converted into a |
| regular pmd from under you (split_huge_pmd can run in parallel to the |
| pagetable walk). If the second pmd_trans_huge returns false, you |
| should just drop the page table lock and fallback to the old code as |
| before. Otherwise you can proceed to process the huge pmd and the |
| hugepage natively. Once finished you can drop the page table lock. |
| |
| == Refcounts and transparent huge pages == |
| |
| Refcounting on THP is mostly consistent with refcounting on other compound |
| pages: |
| |
| - get_page()/put_page() and GUP operate in head page's ->_count. |
| |
| - ->_count in tail pages is always zero: get_page_unless_zero() never |
| succeed on tail pages. |
| |
| - map/unmap of the pages with PTE entry increment/decrement ->_mapcount |
| on relevant sub-page of the compound page. |
| |
| - map/unmap of the whole compound page accounted in compound_mapcount |
| (stored in first tail page). |
| |
| PageDoubleMap() indicates that ->_mapcount in all subpages is offset up by one. |
| This additional reference is required to get race-free detection of unmap of |
| subpages when we have them mapped with both PMDs and PTEs. |
| |
| This is optimization required to lower overhead of per-subpage mapcount |
| tracking. The alternative is alter ->_mapcount in all subpages on each |
| map/unmap of the whole compound page. |
| |
| We set PG_double_map when a PMD of the page got split for the first time, |
| but still have PMD mapping. The addtional references go away with last |
| compound_mapcount. |
| |
| split_huge_page internally has to distribute the refcounts in the head |
| page to the tail pages before clearing all PG_head/tail bits from the page |
| structures. It can be done easily for refcounts taken by page table |
| entries. But we don't have enough information on how to distribute any |
| additional pins (i.e. from get_user_pages). split_huge_page() fails any |
| requests to split pinned huge page: it expects page count to be equal to |
| sum of mapcount of all sub-pages plus one (split_huge_page caller must |
| have reference for head page). |
| |
| split_huge_page uses migration entries to stabilize page->_count and |
| page->_mapcount. |
| |
| We safe against physical memory scanners too: the only legitimate way |
| scanner can get reference to a page is get_page_unless_zero(). |
| |
| All tail pages has zero ->_count until atomic_add(). It prevent scanner |
| from geting reference to tail page up to the point. After the atomic_add() |
| we don't care about ->_count value. We already known how many references |
| with should uncharge from head page. |
| |
| For head page get_page_unless_zero() will succeed and we don't mind. It's |
| clear where reference should go after split: it will stay on head page. |
| |
| Note that split_huge_pmd() doesn't have any limitation on refcounting: |
| pmd can be split at any point and never fails. |
| |
| == Partial unmap and deferred_split_huge_page() == |
| |
| Unmapping part of THP (with munmap() or other way) is not going to free |
| memory immediately. Instead, we detect that a subpage of THP is not in use |
| in page_remove_rmap() and queue the THP for splitting if memory pressure |
| comes. Splitting will free up unused subpages. |
| |
| Splitting the page right away is not an option due to locking context in |
| the place where we can detect partial unmap. It's also might be |
| counterproductive since in many cases partial unmap unmap happens during |
| exit(2) if an THP crosses VMA boundary. |
| |
| Function deferred_split_huge_page() is used to queue page for splitting. |
| The splitting itself will happen when we get memory pressure via shrinker |
| interface. |