| ================== |
| HugeTLB Controller |
| ================== |
| |
| HugeTLB controller can be created by first mounting the cgroup filesystem. |
| |
| # mount -t cgroup -o hugetlb none /sys/fs/cgroup |
| |
| With the above step, the initial or the parent HugeTLB group becomes |
| visible at /sys/fs/cgroup. At bootup, this group includes all the tasks in |
| the system. /sys/fs/cgroup/tasks lists the tasks in this cgroup. |
| |
| New groups can be created under the parent group /sys/fs/cgroup:: |
| |
| # cd /sys/fs/cgroup |
| # mkdir g1 |
| # echo $$ > g1/tasks |
| |
| The above steps create a new group g1 and move the current shell |
| process (bash) into it. |
| |
| Brief summary of control files:: |
| |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.limit_in_bytes # set/show limit of "hugepagesize" hugetlb reservations |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes # show max "hugepagesize" hugetlb reservations and no-reserve faults |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.usage_in_bytes # show current reservations and no-reserve faults for "hugepagesize" hugetlb |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.failcnt # show the number of allocation failure due to HugeTLB reservation limit |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.limit_in_bytes # set/show limit of "hugepagesize" hugetlb faults |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.max_usage_in_bytes # show max "hugepagesize" hugetlb usage recorded |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.usage_in_bytes # show current usage for "hugepagesize" hugetlb |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.failcnt # show the number of allocation failure due to HugeTLB usage limit |
| |
| For a system supporting three hugepage sizes (64k, 32M and 1G), the control |
| files include:: |
| |
| hugetlb.1GB.limit_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.1GB.max_usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.1GB.usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.1GB.failcnt |
| hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.limit_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.failcnt |
| hugetlb.64KB.limit_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.64KB.max_usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.64KB.usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.64KB.failcnt |
| hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.limit_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.failcnt |
| hugetlb.32MB.limit_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.32MB.max_usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.32MB.usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.32MB.failcnt |
| hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.limit_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.failcnt |
| |
| |
| 1. Page fault accounting |
| |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.limit_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.max_usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.failcnt |
| |
| The HugeTLB controller allows users to limit the HugeTLB usage (page fault) per |
| control group and enforces the limit during page fault. Since HugeTLB |
| doesn't support page reclaim, enforcing the limit at page fault time implies |
| that, the application will get SIGBUS signal if it tries to fault in HugeTLB |
| pages beyond its limit. Therefore the application needs to know exactly how many |
| HugeTLB pages it uses before hand, and the sysadmin needs to make sure that |
| there are enough available on the machine for all the users to avoid processes |
| getting SIGBUS. |
| |
| |
| 2. Reservation accounting |
| |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.limit_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.usage_in_bytes |
| hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.failcnt |
| |
| The HugeTLB controller allows to limit the HugeTLB reservations per control |
| group and enforces the controller limit at reservation time and at the fault of |
| HugeTLB memory for which no reservation exists. Since reservation limits are |
| enforced at reservation time (on mmap or shget), reservation limits never causes |
| the application to get SIGBUS signal if the memory was reserved before hand. For |
| MAP_NORESERVE allocations, the reservation limit behaves the same as the fault |
| limit, enforcing memory usage at fault time and causing the application to |
| receive a SIGBUS if it's crossing its limit. |
| |
| Reservation limits are superior to page fault limits described above, since |
| reservation limits are enforced at reservation time (on mmap or shget), and |
| never causes the application to get SIGBUS signal if the memory was reserved |
| before hand. This allows for easier fallback to alternatives such as |
| non-HugeTLB memory for example. In the case of page fault accounting, it's very |
| hard to avoid processes getting SIGBUS since the sysadmin needs precisely know |
| the HugeTLB usage of all the tasks in the system and make sure there is enough |
| pages to satisfy all requests. Avoiding tasks getting SIGBUS on overcommited |
| systems is practically impossible with page fault accounting. |
| |
| |
| 3. Caveats with shared memory |
| |
| For shared HugeTLB memory, both HugeTLB reservation and page faults are charged |
| to the first task that causes the memory to be reserved or faulted, and all |
| subsequent uses of this reserved or faulted memory is done without charging. |
| |
| Shared HugeTLB memory is only uncharged when it is unreserved or deallocated. |
| This is usually when the HugeTLB file is deleted, and not when the task that |
| caused the reservation or fault has exited. |
| |
| |
| 4. Caveats with HugeTLB cgroup offline. |
| |
| When a HugeTLB cgroup goes offline with some reservations or faults still |
| charged to it, the behavior is as follows: |
| |
| - The fault charges are charged to the parent HugeTLB cgroup (reparented), |
| - the reservation charges remain on the offline HugeTLB cgroup. |
| |
| This means that if a HugeTLB cgroup gets offlined while there is still HugeTLB |
| reservations charged to it, that cgroup persists as a zombie until all HugeTLB |
| reservations are uncharged. HugeTLB reservations behave in this manner to match |
| the memory controller whose cgroups also persist as zombie until all charged |
| memory is uncharged. Also, the tracking of HugeTLB reservations is a bit more |
| complex compared to the tracking of HugeTLB faults, so it is significantly |
| harder to reparent reservations at offline time. |