| .. _pgpguide: |
| |
| =========================== |
| Kernel Maintainer PGP guide |
| =========================== |
| |
| :Author: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> |
| |
| This document is aimed at Linux kernel developers, and especially at |
| subsystem maintainers. It contains a subset of information discussed in |
| the more general "`Protecting Code Integrity`_" guide published by the |
| Linux Foundation. Please read that document for more in-depth discussion |
| on some of the topics mentioned in this guide. |
| |
| .. _`Protecting Code Integrity`: https://github.com/lfit/itpol/blob/master/protecting-code-integrity.md |
| |
| The role of PGP in Linux Kernel development |
| =========================================== |
| |
| PGP helps ensure the integrity of the code that is produced by the Linux |
| kernel development community and, to a lesser degree, establish trusted |
| communication channels between developers via PGP-signed email exchange. |
| |
| The Linux kernel source code is available in two main formats: |
| |
| - Distributed source repositories (git) |
| - Periodic release snapshots (tarballs) |
| |
| Both git repositories and tarballs carry PGP signatures of the kernel |
| developers who create official kernel releases. These signatures offer a |
| cryptographic guarantee that downloadable versions made available via |
| kernel.org or any other mirrors are identical to what these developers |
| have on their workstations. To this end: |
| |
| - git repositories provide PGP signatures on all tags |
| - tarballs provide detached PGP signatures with all downloads |
| |
| .. _devs_not_infra: |
| |
| Trusting the developers, not infrastructure |
| ------------------------------------------- |
| |
| Ever since the 2011 compromise of core kernel.org systems, the main |
| operating principle of the Kernel Archives project has been to assume |
| that any part of the infrastructure can be compromised at any time. For |
| this reason, the administrators have taken deliberate steps to emphasize |
| that trust must always be placed with developers and never with the code |
| hosting infrastructure, regardless of how good the security practices |
| for the latter may be. |
| |
| The above guiding principle is the reason why this guide is needed. We |
| want to make sure that by placing trust into developers we do not simply |
| shift the blame for potential future security incidents to someone else. |
| The goal is to provide a set of guidelines developers can use to create |
| a secure working environment and safeguard the PGP keys used to |
| establish the integrity of the Linux kernel itself. |
| |
| .. _pgp_tools: |
| |
| PGP tools |
| ========= |
| |
| Use GnuPG v2 |
| ------------ |
| |
| Your distro should already have GnuPG installed by default, you just |
| need to verify that you are using version 2.x and not the legacy 1.4 |
| release -- many distributions still package both, with the default |
| ``gpg`` command invoking GnuPG v.1. To check, run:: |
| |
| $ gpg --version | head -n1 |
| |
| If you see ``gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.x``, then you are using GnuPG v.1. Try the |
| ``gpg2`` command (if you don't have it, you may need to install the |
| gnupg2 package):: |
| |
| $ gpg2 --version | head -n1 |
| |
| If you see ``gpg (GnuPG) 2.x.x``, then you are good to go. This guide |
| will assume you have the version 2.2 of GnuPG (or later). If you are |
| using version 2.0 of GnuPG, then some of the commands in this guide will |
| not work, and you should consider installing the latest 2.2 version of |
| GnuPG. Versions of gnupg-2.1.11 and later should be compatible for the |
| purposes of this guide as well. |
| |
| If you have both ``gpg`` and ``gpg2`` commands, you should make sure you |
| are always using GnuPG v2, not the legacy version. You can enforce this |
| by setting the appropriate alias:: |
| |
| $ alias gpg=gpg2 |
| |
| You can put that in your ``.bashrc`` to make sure it's always the case. |
| |
| Configure gpg-agent options |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The GnuPG agent is a helper tool that will start automatically whenever |
| you use the ``gpg`` command and run in the background with the purpose |
| of caching the private key passphrase. There are two options you should |
| know in order to tweak when the passphrase should be expired from cache: |
| |
| - ``default-cache-ttl`` (seconds): If you use the same key again before |
| the time-to-live expires, the countdown will reset for another period. |
| The default is 600 (10 minutes). |
| - ``max-cache-ttl`` (seconds): Regardless of how recently you've used |
| the key since initial passphrase entry, if the maximum time-to-live |
| countdown expires, you'll have to enter the passphrase again. The |
| default is 30 minutes. |
| |
| If you find either of these defaults too short (or too long), you can |
| edit your ``~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf`` file to set your own values:: |
| |
| # set to 30 minutes for regular ttl, and 2 hours for max ttl |
| default-cache-ttl 1800 |
| max-cache-ttl 7200 |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| It is no longer necessary to start gpg-agent manually at the |
| beginning of your shell session. You may want to check your rc files |
| to remove anything you had in place for older versions of GnuPG, as |
| it may not be doing the right thing any more. |
| |
| .. _protect_your_key: |
| |
| Protect your PGP key |
| ==================== |
| |
| This guide assumes that you already have a PGP key that you use for Linux |
| kernel development purposes. If you do not yet have one, please see the |
| "`Protecting Code Integrity`_" document mentioned earlier for guidance |
| on how to create a new one. |
| |
| You should also make a new key if your current one is weaker than 2048 |
| bits (RSA). |
| |
| Understanding PGP Subkeys |
| ------------------------- |
| |
| A PGP key rarely consists of a single keypair -- usually it is a |
| collection of independent subkeys that can be used for different |
| purposes based on their capabilities, assigned at their creation time. |
| PGP defines four capabilities that a key can have: |
| |
| - **[S]** keys can be used for signing |
| - **[E]** keys can be used for encryption |
| - **[A]** keys can be used for authentication |
| - **[C]** keys can be used for certifying other keys |
| |
| The key with the **[C]** capability is often called the "master" key, |
| but this terminology is misleading because it implies that the Certify |
| key can be used in place of any of other subkey on the same chain (like |
| a physical "master key" can be used to open the locks made for other |
| keys). Since this is not the case, this guide will refer to it as "the |
| Certify key" to avoid any ambiguity. |
| |
| It is critical to fully understand the following: |
| |
| 1. All subkeys are fully independent from each other. If you lose a |
| private subkey, it cannot be restored or recreated from any other |
| private key on your chain. |
| 2. With the exception of the Certify key, there can be multiple subkeys |
| with identical capabilities (e.g. you can have 2 valid encryption |
| subkeys, 3 valid signing subkeys, but only one valid certification |
| subkey). All subkeys are fully independent -- a message encrypted to |
| one **[E]** subkey cannot be decrypted with any other **[E]** subkey |
| you may also have. |
| 3. A single subkey may have multiple capabilities (e.g. your **[C]** key |
| can also be your **[S]** key). |
| |
| The key carrying the **[C]** (certify) capability is the only key that |
| can be used to indicate relationship with other keys. Only the **[C]** |
| key can be used to: |
| |
| - add or revoke other keys (subkeys) with S/E/A capabilities |
| - add, change or revoke identities (uids) associated with the key |
| - add or change the expiration date on itself or any subkey |
| - sign other people's keys for web of trust purposes |
| |
| By default, GnuPG creates the following when generating new keys: |
| |
| - One subkey carrying both Certify and Sign capabilities (**[SC]**) |
| - A separate subkey with the Encryption capability (**[E]**) |
| |
| If you used the default parameters when generating your key, then that |
| is what you will have. You can verify by running ``gpg --list-secret-keys``, |
| for example:: |
| |
| sec rsa2048 2018-01-23 [SC] [expires: 2020-01-23] |
| 000000000000000000000000AAAABBBBCCCCDDDD |
| uid [ultimate] Alice Dev <adev@kernel.org> |
| ssb rsa2048 2018-01-23 [E] [expires: 2020-01-23] |
| |
| The long line under the ``sec`` entry is your key fingerprint -- |
| whenever you see ``[fpr]`` in the examples below, that 40-character |
| string is what it refers to. |
| |
| Ensure your passphrase is strong |
| -------------------------------- |
| |
| GnuPG uses passphrases to encrypt your private keys before storing them on |
| disk. This way, even if your ``.gnupg`` directory is leaked or stolen in |
| its entirety, the attackers cannot use your private keys without first |
| obtaining the passphrase to decrypt them. |
| |
| It is absolutely essential that your private keys are protected by a |
| strong passphrase. To set it or change it, use:: |
| |
| $ gpg --change-passphrase [fpr] |
| |
| Create a separate Signing subkey |
| -------------------------------- |
| |
| Our goal is to protect your Certify key by moving it to offline media, |
| so if you only have a combined **[SC]** key, then you should create a |
| separate signing subkey:: |
| |
| $ gpg --quick-addkey [fpr] ed25519 sign |
| |
| .. note:: ECC support in GnuPG |
| |
| GnuPG 2.1 and later has full support for Elliptic Curve |
| Cryptography, with ability to combine ECC subkeys with traditional |
| RSA keys. The main upside of ECC cryptography is that it is much |
| faster computationally and creates much smaller signatures when |
| compared byte for byte with 2048+ bit RSA keys. Unless you plan on |
| using a smartcard device that does not support ECC operations, we |
| recommend that you create an ECC signing subkey for your kernel |
| work. |
| |
| Note, that if you plan to use a hardware device that does not |
| support ED25519 ECC keys, you should choose "nistp256" instead or |
| "ed25519." |
| |
| |
| Back up your Certify key for disaster recovery |
| ---------------------------------------------- |
| |
| The more signatures you have on your PGP key from other developers, the |
| more reasons you have to create a backup version that lives on something |
| other than digital media, for disaster recovery reasons. |
| |
| The best way to create a printable hardcopy of your private key is by |
| using the ``paperkey`` software written for this very purpose. See ``man |
| paperkey`` for more details on the output format and its benefits over |
| other solutions. Paperkey should already be packaged for most |
| distributions. |
| |
| Run the following command to create a hardcopy backup of your private |
| key:: |
| |
| $ gpg --export-secret-key [fpr] | paperkey -o /tmp/key-backup.txt |
| |
| Print out that file (or pipe the output straight to lpr), then take a |
| pen and write your passphrase on the margin of the paper. **This is |
| strongly recommended** because the key printout is still encrypted with |
| that passphrase, and if you ever change it you will not remember what it |
| used to be when you had created the backup -- *guaranteed*. |
| |
| Put the resulting printout and the hand-written passphrase into an envelope |
| and store in a secure and well-protected place, preferably away from your |
| home, such as your bank vault. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| Your printer is probably no longer a simple dumb device connected to |
| your parallel port, but since the output is still encrypted with |
| your passphrase, printing out even to "cloud-integrated" modern |
| printers should remain a relatively safe operation. |
| |
| Back up your whole GnuPG directory |
| ---------------------------------- |
| |
| .. warning:: |
| |
| **!!!Do not skip this step!!!** |
| |
| It is important to have a readily available backup of your PGP keys |
| should you need to recover them. This is different from the |
| disaster-level preparedness we did with ``paperkey``. You will also rely |
| on these external copies whenever you need to use your Certify key -- |
| such as when making changes to your own key or signing other people's |
| keys after conferences and summits. |
| |
| Start by getting a small USB "thumb" drive (preferably two!) that you |
| will use for backup purposes. You will need to encrypt them using LUKS |
| -- refer to your distro's documentation on how to accomplish this. |
| |
| For the encryption passphrase, you can use the same one as on your |
| PGP key. |
| |
| Once the encryption process is over, re-insert the USB drive and make |
| sure it gets properly mounted. Copy your entire ``.gnupg`` directory |
| over to the encrypted storage:: |
| |
| $ cp -a ~/.gnupg /media/disk/foo/gnupg-backup |
| |
| You should now test to make sure everything still works:: |
| |
| $ gpg --homedir=/media/disk/foo/gnupg-backup --list-key [fpr] |
| |
| If you don't get any errors, then you should be good to go. Unmount the |
| USB drive, distinctly label it so you don't blow it away next time you |
| need to use a random USB drive, and put in a safe place -- but not too |
| far away, because you'll need to use it every now and again for things |
| like editing identities, adding or revoking subkeys, or signing other |
| people's keys. |
| |
| Remove the Certify key from your homedir |
| ---------------------------------------- |
| |
| The files in our home directory are not as well protected as we like to |
| think. They can be leaked or stolen via many different means: |
| |
| - by accident when making quick homedir copies to set up a new workstation |
| - by systems administrator negligence or malice |
| - via poorly secured backups |
| - via malware in desktop apps (browsers, pdf viewers, etc) |
| - via coercion when crossing international borders |
| |
| Protecting your key with a good passphrase greatly helps reduce the risk |
| of any of the above, but passphrases can be discovered via keyloggers, |
| shoulder-surfing, or any number of other means. For this reason, the |
| recommended setup is to remove your Certify key from your home directory |
| and store it on offline storage. |
| |
| .. warning:: |
| |
| Please see the previous section and make sure you have backed up |
| your GnuPG directory in its entirety. What we are about to do will |
| render your key useless if you do not have a usable backup! |
| |
| First, identify the keygrip of your Certify key:: |
| |
| $ gpg --with-keygrip --list-key [fpr] |
| |
| The output will be something like this:: |
| |
| pub rsa2048 2018-01-24 [SC] [expires: 2020-01-24] |
| 000000000000000000000000AAAABBBBCCCCDDDD |
| Keygrip = 1111000000000000000000000000000000000000 |
| uid [ultimate] Alice Dev <adev@kernel.org> |
| sub rsa2048 2018-01-24 [E] [expires: 2020-01-24] |
| Keygrip = 2222000000000000000000000000000000000000 |
| sub ed25519 2018-01-24 [S] |
| Keygrip = 3333000000000000000000000000000000000000 |
| |
| Find the keygrip entry that is beneath the ``pub`` line (right under the |
| Certify key fingerprint). This will correspond directly to a file in your |
| ``~/.gnupg`` directory:: |
| |
| $ cd ~/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d |
| $ ls |
| 1111000000000000000000000000000000000000.key |
| 2222000000000000000000000000000000000000.key |
| 3333000000000000000000000000000000000000.key |
| |
| All you have to do is simply remove the .key file that corresponds to |
| the Certify key keygrip:: |
| |
| $ cd ~/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d |
| $ rm 1111000000000000000000000000000000000000.key |
| |
| Now, if you issue the ``--list-secret-keys`` command, it will show that |
| the Certify key is missing (the ``#`` indicates it is not available):: |
| |
| $ gpg --list-secret-keys |
| sec# rsa2048 2018-01-24 [SC] [expires: 2020-01-24] |
| 000000000000000000000000AAAABBBBCCCCDDDD |
| uid [ultimate] Alice Dev <adev@kernel.org> |
| ssb rsa2048 2018-01-24 [E] [expires: 2020-01-24] |
| ssb ed25519 2018-01-24 [S] |
| |
| You should also remove any ``secring.gpg`` files in the ``~/.gnupg`` |
| directory, which are left over from earlier versions of GnuPG. |
| |
| If you don't have the "private-keys-v1.d" directory |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| If you do not have a ``~/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d`` directory, then your |
| secret keys are still stored in the legacy ``secring.gpg`` file used by |
| GnuPG v1. Making any changes to your key, such as changing the |
| passphrase or adding a subkey, should automatically convert the old |
| ``secring.gpg`` format to use ``private-keys-v1.d`` instead. |
| |
| Once you get that done, make sure to delete the obsolete ``secring.gpg`` |
| file, which still contains your private keys. |
| |
| .. _smartcards: |
| |
| Move the subkeys to a dedicated crypto device |
| ============================================= |
| |
| Even though the Certify key is now safe from being leaked or stolen, the |
| subkeys are still in your home directory. Anyone who manages to get |
| their hands on those will be able to decrypt your communication or fake |
| your signatures (if they know the passphrase). Furthermore, each time a |
| GnuPG operation is performed, the keys are loaded into system memory and |
| can be stolen from there by sufficiently advanced malware (think |
| Meltdown and Spectre). |
| |
| The best way to completely protect your keys is to move them to a |
| specialized hardware device that is capable of smartcard operations. |
| |
| The benefits of smartcards |
| -------------------------- |
| |
| A smartcard contains a cryptographic chip that is capable of storing |
| private keys and performing crypto operations directly on the card |
| itself. Because the key contents never leave the smartcard, the |
| operating system of the computer into which you plug in the hardware |
| device is not able to retrieve the private keys themselves. This is very |
| different from the encrypted USB storage device we used earlier for |
| backup purposes -- while that USB device is plugged in and mounted, the |
| operating system is able to access the private key contents. |
| |
| Using external encrypted USB media is not a substitute to having a |
| smartcard-capable device. |
| |
| Available smartcard devices |
| --------------------------- |
| |
| Unless all your laptops and workstations have smartcard readers, the |
| easiest is to get a specialized USB device that implements smartcard |
| functionality. There are several options available: |
| |
| - `Nitrokey Start`_: Open hardware and Free Software, based on FSI |
| Japan's `Gnuk`_. One of the few available commercial devices that |
| support ED25519 ECC keys, but offer fewest security features (such as |
| resistance to tampering or some side-channel attacks). |
| - `Nitrokey Pro 2`_: Similar to the Nitrokey Start, but more |
| tamper-resistant and offers more security features. Pro 2 supports ECC |
| cryptography (NISTP). |
| - `Yubikey 5`_: proprietary hardware and software, but cheaper than |
| Nitrokey Pro and comes available in the USB-C form that is more useful |
| with newer laptops. Offers additional security features such as FIDO |
| U2F, among others, and now finally supports NISTP and ED25519 ECC |
| keys. |
| |
| `LWN has a good review`_ of some of the above models, as well as several |
| others. Your choice will depend on cost, shipping availability in your |
| geographical region, and open/proprietary hardware considerations. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| If you are listed in MAINTAINERS or have an account at kernel.org, |
| you `qualify for a free Nitrokey Start`_ courtesy of The Linux |
| Foundation. |
| |
| .. _`Nitrokey Start`: https://shop.nitrokey.com/shop/product/nitrokey-start-6 |
| .. _`Nitrokey Pro 2`: https://shop.nitrokey.com/shop/product/nkpr2-nitrokey-pro-2-3 |
| .. _`Yubikey 5`: https://www.yubico.com/products/yubikey-5-overview/ |
| .. _Gnuk: https://www.fsij.org/doc-gnuk/ |
| .. _`LWN has a good review`: https://lwn.net/Articles/736231/ |
| .. _`qualify for a free Nitrokey Start`: https://www.kernel.org/nitrokey-digital-tokens-for-kernel-developers.html |
| |
| Configure your smartcard device |
| ------------------------------- |
| |
| Your smartcard device should Just Work (TM) the moment you plug it into |
| any modern Linux workstation. You can verify it by running:: |
| |
| $ gpg --card-status |
| |
| If you see full smartcard details, then you are good to go. |
| Unfortunately, troubleshooting all possible reasons why things may not |
| be working for you is way beyond the scope of this guide. If you are |
| having trouble getting the card to work with GnuPG, please seek help via |
| usual support channels. |
| |
| To configure your smartcard, you will need to use the GnuPG menu system, as |
| there are no convenient command-line switches:: |
| |
| $ gpg --card-edit |
| [...omitted...] |
| gpg/card> admin |
| Admin commands are allowed |
| gpg/card> passwd |
| |
| You should set the user PIN (1), Admin PIN (3), and the Reset Code (4). |
| Please make sure to record and store these in a safe place -- especially |
| the Admin PIN and the Reset Code (which allows you to completely wipe |
| the smartcard). You so rarely need to use the Admin PIN, that you will |
| inevitably forget what it is if you do not record it. |
| |
| Getting back to the main card menu, you can also set other values (such |
| as name, sex, login data, etc), but it's not necessary and will |
| additionally leak information about your smartcard should you lose it. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| Despite having the name "PIN", neither the user PIN nor the admin |
| PIN on the card need to be numbers. |
| |
| .. warning:: |
| |
| Some devices may require that you move the subkeys onto the device |
| before you can change the passphrase. Please check the documentation |
| provided by the device manufacturer. |
| |
| Move the subkeys to your smartcard |
| ---------------------------------- |
| |
| Exit the card menu (using "q") and save all changes. Next, let's move |
| your subkeys onto the smartcard. You will need both your PGP key |
| passphrase and the admin PIN of the card for most operations:: |
| |
| $ gpg --edit-key [fpr] |
| |
| Secret subkeys are available. |
| |
| pub rsa2048/AAAABBBBCCCCDDDD |
| created: 2018-01-23 expires: 2020-01-23 usage: SC |
| trust: ultimate validity: ultimate |
| ssb rsa2048/1111222233334444 |
| created: 2018-01-23 expires: never usage: E |
| ssb ed25519/5555666677778888 |
| created: 2017-12-07 expires: never usage: S |
| [ultimate] (1). Alice Dev <adev@kernel.org> |
| |
| gpg> |
| |
| Using ``--edit-key`` puts us into the menu mode again, and you will |
| notice that the key listing is a little different. From here on, all |
| commands are done from inside this menu mode, as indicated by ``gpg>``. |
| |
| First, let's select the key we'll be putting onto the card -- you do |
| this by typing ``key 1`` (it's the first one in the listing, the **[E]** |
| subkey):: |
| |
| gpg> key 1 |
| |
| In the output, you should now see ``ssb*`` on the **[E]** key. The ``*`` |
| indicates which key is currently "selected." It works as a *toggle*, |
| meaning that if you type ``key 1`` again, the ``*`` will disappear and |
| the key will not be selected any more. |
| |
| Now, let's move that key onto the smartcard:: |
| |
| gpg> keytocard |
| Please select where to store the key: |
| (2) Encryption key |
| Your selection? 2 |
| |
| Since it's our **[E]** key, it makes sense to put it into the Encryption |
| slot. When you submit your selection, you will be prompted first for |
| your PGP key passphrase, and then for the admin PIN. If the command |
| returns without an error, your key has been moved. |
| |
| **Important**: Now type ``key 1`` again to unselect the first key, and |
| ``key 2`` to select the **[S]** key:: |
| |
| gpg> key 1 |
| gpg> key 2 |
| gpg> keytocard |
| Please select where to store the key: |
| (1) Signature key |
| (3) Authentication key |
| Your selection? 1 |
| |
| You can use the **[S]** key both for Signature and Authentication, but |
| we want to make sure it's in the Signature slot, so choose (1). Once |
| again, if your command returns without an error, then the operation was |
| successful:: |
| |
| gpg> q |
| Save changes? (y/N) y |
| |
| Saving the changes will delete the keys you moved to the card from your |
| home directory (but it's okay, because we have them in our backups |
| should we need to do this again for a replacement smartcard). |
| |
| Verifying that the keys were moved |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| If you perform ``--list-secret-keys`` now, you will see a subtle |
| difference in the output:: |
| |
| $ gpg --list-secret-keys |
| sec# rsa2048 2018-01-24 [SC] [expires: 2020-01-24] |
| 000000000000000000000000AAAABBBBCCCCDDDD |
| uid [ultimate] Alice Dev <adev@kernel.org> |
| ssb> rsa2048 2018-01-24 [E] [expires: 2020-01-24] |
| ssb> ed25519 2018-01-24 [S] |
| |
| The ``>`` in the ``ssb>`` output indicates that the subkey is only |
| available on the smartcard. If you go back into your secret keys |
| directory and look at the contents there, you will notice that the |
| ``.key`` files there have been replaced with stubs:: |
| |
| $ cd ~/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d |
| $ strings *.key | grep 'private-key' |
| |
| The output should contain ``shadowed-private-key`` to indicate that |
| these files are only stubs and the actual content is on the smartcard. |
| |
| Verifying that the smartcard is functioning |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| To verify that the smartcard is working as intended, you can create a |
| signature:: |
| |
| $ echo "Hello world" | gpg --clearsign > /tmp/test.asc |
| $ gpg --verify /tmp/test.asc |
| |
| This should ask for your smartcard PIN on your first command, and then |
| show "Good signature" after you run ``gpg --verify``. |
| |
| Congratulations, you have successfully made it extremely difficult to |
| steal your digital developer identity! |
| |
| Other common GnuPG operations |
| ----------------------------- |
| |
| Here is a quick reference for some common operations you'll need to do |
| with your PGP key. |
| |
| Mounting your safe offline storage |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| You will need your Certify key for any of the operations below, so you |
| will first need to mount your backup offline storage and tell GnuPG to |
| use it:: |
| |
| $ export GNUPGHOME=/media/disk/foo/gnupg-backup |
| $ gpg --list-secret-keys |
| |
| You want to make sure that you see ``sec`` and not ``sec#`` in the |
| output (the ``#`` means the key is not available and you're still using |
| your regular home directory location). |
| |
| Extending key expiration date |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The Certify key has the default expiration date of 2 years from the date |
| of creation. This is done both for security reasons and to make obsolete |
| keys eventually disappear from keyservers. |
| |
| To extend the expiration on your key by a year from current date, just |
| run:: |
| |
| $ gpg --quick-set-expire [fpr] 1y |
| |
| You can also use a specific date if that is easier to remember (e.g. |
| your birthday, January 1st, or Canada Day):: |
| |
| $ gpg --quick-set-expire [fpr] 2020-07-01 |
| |
| Remember to send the updated key back to keyservers:: |
| |
| $ gpg --send-key [fpr] |
| |
| Updating your work directory after any changes |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| After you make any changes to your key using the offline storage, you will |
| want to import these changes back into your regular working directory:: |
| |
| $ gpg --export | gpg --homedir ~/.gnupg --import |
| $ unset GNUPGHOME |
| |
| Using gpg-agent over ssh |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| You can forward your gpg-agent over ssh if you need to sign tags or |
| commits on a remote system. Please refer to the instructions provided |
| on the GnuPG wiki: |
| |
| - `Agent Forwarding over SSH`_ |
| |
| It works more smoothly if you can modify the sshd server settings on the |
| remote end. |
| |
| .. _`Agent Forwarding over SSH`: https://wiki.gnupg.org/AgentForwarding |
| |
| .. _pgp_with_git: |
| |
| Using PGP with Git |
| ================== |
| |
| One of the core features of Git is its decentralized nature -- once a |
| repository is cloned to your system, you have full history of the |
| project, including all of its tags, commits and branches. However, with |
| hundreds of cloned repositories floating around, how does anyone verify |
| that their copy of linux.git has not been tampered with by a malicious |
| third party? |
| |
| Or what happens if a backdoor is discovered in the code and the "Author" |
| line in the commit says it was done by you, while you're pretty sure you |
| had `nothing to do with it`_? |
| |
| To address both of these issues, Git introduced PGP integration. Signed |
| tags prove the repository integrity by assuring that its contents are |
| exactly the same as on the workstation of the developer who created the |
| tag, while signed commits make it nearly impossible for someone to |
| impersonate you without having access to your PGP keys. |
| |
| .. _`nothing to do with it`: https://github.com/jayphelps/git-blame-someone-else |
| |
| Configure git to use your PGP key |
| --------------------------------- |
| |
| If you only have one secret key in your keyring, then you don't really |
| need to do anything extra, as it becomes your default key. However, if |
| you happen to have multiple secret keys, you can tell git which key |
| should be used (``[fpr]`` is the fingerprint of your key):: |
| |
| $ git config --global user.signingKey [fpr] |
| |
| **IMPORTANT**: If you have a distinct ``gpg2`` command, then you should |
| tell git to always use it instead of the legacy ``gpg`` from version 1:: |
| |
| $ git config --global gpg.program gpg2 |
| $ git config --global gpgv.program gpgv2 |
| |
| How to work with signed tags |
| ---------------------------- |
| |
| To create a signed tag, simply pass the ``-s`` switch to the tag |
| command:: |
| |
| $ git tag -s [tagname] |
| |
| Our recommendation is to always sign git tags, as this allows other |
| developers to ensure that the git repository they are pulling from has |
| not been maliciously altered. |
| |
| How to verify signed tags |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| To verify a signed tag, simply use the ``verify-tag`` command:: |
| |
| $ git verify-tag [tagname] |
| |
| If you are pulling a tag from another fork of the project repository, |
| git should automatically verify the signature at the tip you're pulling |
| and show you the results during the merge operation:: |
| |
| $ git pull [url] tags/sometag |
| |
| The merge message will contain something like this:: |
| |
| Merge tag 'sometag' of [url] |
| |
| [Tag message] |
| |
| # gpg: Signature made [...] |
| # gpg: Good signature from [...] |
| |
| If you are verifying someone else's git tag, then you will need to |
| import their PGP key. Please refer to the |
| ":ref:`verify_identities`" section below. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| If you get "``gpg: Can't check signature: unknown pubkey |
| algorithm``" error, you need to tell git to use gpgv2 for |
| verification, so it properly processes signatures made by ECC keys. |
| See instructions at the start of this section. |
| |
| Configure git to always sign annotated tags |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Chances are, if you're creating an annotated tag, you'll want to sign |
| it. To force git to always sign annotated tags, you can set a global |
| configuration option:: |
| |
| $ git config --global tag.forceSignAnnotated true |
| |
| How to work with signed commits |
| ------------------------------- |
| |
| It is easy to create signed commits, but it is much more difficult to |
| use them in Linux kernel development, since it relies on patches sent to |
| the mailing list, and this workflow does not preserve PGP commit |
| signatures. Furthermore, when rebasing your repository to match |
| upstream, even your own PGP commit signatures will end up discarded. For |
| this reason, most kernel developers don't bother signing their commits |
| and will ignore signed commits in any external repositories that they |
| rely upon in their work. |
| |
| However, if you have your working git tree publicly available at some |
| git hosting service (kernel.org, infradead.org, ozlabs.org, or others), |
| then the recommendation is that you sign all your git commits even if |
| upstream developers do not directly benefit from this practice. |
| |
| We recommend this for the following reasons: |
| |
| 1. Should there ever be a need to perform code forensics or track code |
| provenance, even externally maintained trees carrying PGP commit |
| signatures will be valuable for such purposes. |
| 2. If you ever need to re-clone your local repository (for example, |
| after a disk failure), this lets you easily verify the repository |
| integrity before resuming your work. |
| 3. If someone needs to cherry-pick your commits, this allows them to |
| quickly verify their integrity before applying them. |
| |
| Creating signed commits |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| To create a signed commit, you just need to pass the ``-S`` flag to the |
| ``git commit`` command (it's capital ``-S`` due to collision with |
| another flag):: |
| |
| $ git commit -S |
| |
| Configure git to always sign commits |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| You can tell git to always sign commits:: |
| |
| git config --global commit.gpgSign true |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| Make sure you configure ``gpg-agent`` before you turn this on. |
| |
| .. _verify_identities: |
| |
| |
| How to work with signed patches |
| ------------------------------- |
| |
| It is possible to use your PGP key to sign patches sent to kernel |
| developer mailing lists. Since existing email signature mechanisms |
| (PGP-Mime or PGP-inline) tend to cause problems with regular code |
| review tasks, you should use the tool kernel.org created for this |
| purpose that puts cryptographic attestation signatures into message |
| headers (a-la DKIM): |
| |
| - `Patatt Patch Attestation`_ |
| |
| .. _`Patatt Patch Attestation`: https://pypi.org/project/patatt/ |
| |
| Installing and configuring patatt |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Patatt is packaged for many distributions already, so please check there |
| first. You can also install it from pypi using "``pip install patatt``". |
| |
| If you already have your PGP key configured with git (via the |
| ``user.signingKey`` configuration parameter), then patatt requires no |
| further configuration. You can start signing your patches by installing |
| the git-send-email hook in the repository you want:: |
| |
| patatt install-hook |
| |
| Now any patches you send with ``git send-email`` will be automatically |
| signed with your cryptographic signature. |
| |
| Checking patatt signatures |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| If you are using ``b4`` to retrieve and apply patches, then it will |
| automatically attempt to verify all DKIM and patatt signatures it |
| encounters, for example:: |
| |
| $ b4 am 20220720205013.890942-1-broonie@kernel.org |
| [...] |
| Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... |
| --- |
| ✓ [PATCH v1 1/3] kselftest/arm64: Correct buffer allocation for SVE Z registers |
| ✓ [PATCH v1 2/3] arm64/sve: Document our actual ABI for clearing registers on syscall |
| ✓ [PATCH v1 3/3] kselftest/arm64: Enforce actual ABI for SVE syscalls |
| --- |
| ✓ Signed: openpgp/broonie@kernel.org |
| ✓ Signed: DKIM/kernel.org |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| Patatt and b4 are still in active development and you should check |
| the latest documentation for these projects for any new or updated |
| features. |
| |
| .. _kernel_identities: |
| |
| How to verify kernel developer identities |
| ========================================= |
| |
| Signing tags and commits is easy, but how does one go about verifying |
| that the key used to sign something belongs to the actual kernel |
| developer and not to a malicious imposter? |
| |
| Configure auto-key-retrieval using WKD and DANE |
| ----------------------------------------------- |
| |
| If you are not already someone with an extensive collection of other |
| developers' public keys, then you can jumpstart your keyring by relying |
| on key auto-discovery and auto-retrieval. GnuPG can piggyback on other |
| delegated trust technologies, namely DNSSEC and TLS, to get you going if |
| the prospect of starting your own Web of Trust from scratch is too |
| daunting. |
| |
| Add the following to your ``~/.gnupg/gpg.conf``:: |
| |
| auto-key-locate wkd,dane,local |
| auto-key-retrieve |
| |
| DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities ("DANE") is a method for |
| publishing public keys in DNS and securing them using DNSSEC signed |
| zones. Web Key Directory ("WKD") is the alternative method that uses |
| https lookups for the same purpose. When using either DANE or WKD for |
| looking up public keys, GnuPG will validate DNSSEC or TLS certificates, |
| respectively, before adding auto-retrieved public keys to your local |
| keyring. |
| |
| Kernel.org publishes the WKD for all developers who have kernel.org |
| accounts. Once you have the above changes in your ``gpg.conf``, you can |
| auto-retrieve the keys for Linus Torvalds and Greg Kroah-Hartman (if you |
| don't already have them):: |
| |
| $ gpg --locate-keys torvalds@kernel.org gregkh@kernel.org |
| |
| If you have a kernel.org account, then you should `add the kernel.org |
| UID to your key`_ to make WKD more useful to other kernel developers. |
| |
| .. _`add the kernel.org UID to your key`: https://korg.wiki.kernel.org/userdoc/mail#adding_a_kernelorg_uid_to_your_pgp_key |
| |
| Web of Trust (WOT) vs. Trust on First Use (TOFU) |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| PGP incorporates a trust delegation mechanism known as the "Web of |
| Trust." At its core, this is an attempt to replace the need for |
| centralized Certification Authorities of the HTTPS/TLS world. Instead of |
| various software makers dictating who should be your trusted certifying |
| entity, PGP leaves this responsibility to each user. |
| |
| Unfortunately, very few people understand how the Web of Trust works. |
| While it remains an important aspect of the OpenPGP specification, |
| recent versions of GnuPG (2.2 and above) have implemented an alternative |
| mechanism called "Trust on First Use" (TOFU). You can think of TOFU as |
| "the SSH-like approach to trust." With SSH, the first time you connect |
| to a remote system, its key fingerprint is recorded and remembered. If |
| the key changes in the future, the SSH client will alert you and refuse |
| to connect, forcing you to make a decision on whether you choose to |
| trust the changed key or not. Similarly, the first time you import |
| someone's PGP key, it is assumed to be valid. If at any point in the |
| future GnuPG comes across another key with the same identity, both the |
| previously imported key and the new key will be marked as invalid and |
| you will need to manually figure out which one to keep. |
| |
| We recommend that you use the combined TOFU+PGP trust model (which is |
| the new default in GnuPG v2). To set it, add (or modify) the |
| ``trust-model`` setting in ``~/.gnupg/gpg.conf``:: |
| |
| trust-model tofu+pgp |
| |
| Using the kernel.org web of trust repository |
| -------------------------------------------- |
| |
| Kernel.org maintains a git repository with developers' public keys as a |
| replacement for replicating keyserver networks that have gone mostly |
| dark in the past few years. The full documentation for how to set up |
| that repository as your source of public keys can be found here: |
| |
| - `Kernel developer PGP Keyring`_ |
| |
| If you are a kernel developer, please consider submitting your key for |
| inclusion into that keyring. |
| |
| .. _`Kernel developer PGP Keyring`: https://korg.docs.kernel.org/pgpkeys.html |