| ========================== | |
| Bulk Register Access (BRA) | |
| ========================== | |
| Conventions | |
| ----------- | |
| Capitalized words used in this documentation are intentional and refer | |
| to concepts of the SoundWire 1.x specification. | |
| Introduction | |
| ------------ | |
| The SoundWire 1.x specification provides a mechanism to speed-up | |
| command/control transfers by reclaiming parts of the audio | |
| bandwidth. The Bulk Register Access (BRA) protocol is a standard | |
| solution based on the Bulk Payload Transport (BPT) definitions. | |
| The regular control channel uses Column 0 and can only send/retrieve | |
| one byte per frame with write/read commands. With a typical 48kHz | |
| frame rate, only 48kB/s can be transferred. | |
| The optional Bulk Register Access capability can transmit up to 12 | |
| Mbits/s and reduce transfer times by several orders of magnitude, but | |
| has multiple design constraints: | |
| (1) Each frame can only support a read or a write transfer, with a | |
| 10-byte overhead per frame (header and footer response). | |
| (2) The read/writes SHALL be from/to contiguous register addresses | |
| in the same frame. A fragmented register space decreases the | |
| efficiency of the protocol by requiring multiple BRA transfers | |
| scheduled in different frames. | |
| (3) The targeted Peripheral device SHALL support the optional Data | |
| Port 0, and likewise the Manager SHALL expose audio-like Ports | |
| to insert BRA packets in the audio payload using the concepts of | |
| Sample Interval, HSTART, HSTOP, etc. | |
| (4) The BRA transport efficiency depends on the available | |
| bandwidth. If there are no on-going audio transfers, the entire | |
| frame minus Column 0 can be reclaimed for BRA. The frame shape | |
| also impacts efficiency: since Column0 cannot be used for | |
| BTP/BRA, the frame should rely on a large number of columns and | |
| minimize the number of rows. The bus clock should be as high as | |
| possible. | |
| (5) The number of bits transferred per frame SHALL be a multiple of | |
| 8 bits. Padding bits SHALL be inserted if necessary at the end | |
| of the data. | |
| (6) The regular read/write commands can be issued in parallel with | |
| BRA transfers. This is convenient to e.g. deal with alerts, jack | |
| detection or change the volume during firmware download, but | |
| accessing the same address with two independent protocols has to | |
| be avoided to avoid undefined behavior. | |
| (7) Some implementations may not be capable of handling the | |
| bandwidth of the BRA protocol, e.g. in the case of a slow I2C | |
| bus behind the SoundWire IP. In this case, the transfers may | |
| need to be spaced in time or flow-controlled. | |
| (8) Each BRA packet SHALL be marked as 'Active' when valid data is | |
| to be transmitted. This allows for software to allocate a BRA | |
| stream but not transmit/discard data while processing the | |
| results or preparing the next batch of data, or allowing the | |
| peripheral to deal with the previous transfer. In addition BRA | |
| transfer can be started early on without data being ready. | |
| (9) Up to 470 bytes may be transmitted per frame. | |
| (10) The address is represented with 32 bits and does not rely on | |
| the paging registers used for the regular command/control | |
| protocol in Column 0. | |
| Error checking | |
| -------------- | |
| Firmware download is one of the key usages of the Bulk Register Access | |
| protocol. To make sure the binary data integrity is not compromised by | |
| transmission or programming errors, each BRA packet provides: | |
| (1) A CRC on the 7-byte header. This CRC helps the Peripheral Device | |
| check if it is addressed and set the start address and number of | |
| bytes. The Peripheral Device provides a response in Byte 7. | |
| (2) A CRC on the data block (header excluded). This CRC is | |
| transmitted as the last-but-one byte in the packet, prior to the | |
| footer response. | |
| The header response can be one of: | |
| (a) Ack | |
| (b) Nak | |
| (c) Not Ready | |
| The footer response can be one of: | |
| (1) Ack | |
| (2) Nak (CRC failure) | |
| (3) Good (operation completed) | |
| (4) Bad (operation failed) | |
| Example frame | |
| ------------- | |
| The example below is not to scale and makes simplifying assumptions | |
| for clarity. The different chunks in the BRA packets are not required | |
| to start on a new SoundWire Row, and the scale of data may vary. | |
| :: | |
| +---+--------------------------------------------+ | |
| + | | | |
| + | BRA HEADER | | |
| + | | | |
| + +--------------------------------------------+ | |
| + C | HEADER CRC | | |
| + O +--------------------------------------------+ | |
| + M | HEADER RESPONSE | | |
| + M +--------------------------------------------+ | |
| + A | | | |
| + N | | | |
| + D | DATA | | |
| + | | | |
| + | | | |
| + | | | |
| + +--------------------------------------------+ | |
| + | DATA CRC | | |
| + +--------------------------------------------+ | |
| + | FOOTER RESPONSE | | |
| +---+--------------------------------------------+ | |
| Assuming the frame uses N columns, the configuration shown above can | |
| be programmed by setting the DP0 registers as: | |
| - HSTART = 1 | |
| - HSTOP = N - 1 | |
| - Sampling Interval = N | |
| - WordLength = N - 1 | |
| Addressing restrictions | |
| ----------------------- | |
| The Device Number specified in the Header follows the SoundWire | |
| definitions, and broadcast and group addressing are permitted. For now | |
| the Linux implementation only allows for a single BPT transfer to a | |
| single device at a time. This might be revisited at a later point as | |
| an optimization to send the same firmware to multiple devices, but | |
| this would only be beneficial for single-link solutions. | |
| In the case of multiple Peripheral devices attached to different | |
| Managers, the broadcast and group addressing is not supported by the | |
| SoundWire specification. Each device must be handled with separate BRA | |
| streams, possibly in parallel - the links are really independent. | |
| Unsupported features | |
| -------------------- | |
| The Bulk Register Access specification provides a number of | |
| capabilities that are not supported in known implementations, such as: | |
| (1) Transfers initiated by a Peripheral Device. The BRA Initiator is | |
| always the Manager Device. | |
| (2) Flow-control capabilities and retransmission based on the | |
| 'NotReady' header response require extra buffering in the | |
| SoundWire IP and are not implemented. | |
| Bi-directional handling | |
| ----------------------- | |
| The BRA protocol can handle writes as well as reads, and in each | |
| packet the header and footer response are provided by the Peripheral | |
| Target device. On the Peripheral device, the BRA protocol is handled | |
| by a single DP0 data port, and at the low-level the bus ownership can | |
| will change for header/footer response as well as the data transmitted | |
| during a read. | |
| On the host side, most implementations rely on a Port-like concept, | |
| with two FIFOs consuming/generating data transfers in parallel | |
| (Host->Peripheral and Peripheral->Host). The amount of data | |
| consumed/produced by these FIFOs is not symmetrical, as a result | |
| hardware typically inserts markers to help software and hardware | |
| interpret raw data | |
| Each packet will typically have: | |
| (1) a 'Start of Packet' indicator. | |
| (2) an 'End of Packet' indicator. | |
| (3) a packet identifier to correlate the data requested and | |
| transmitted, and the error status for each frame | |
| Hardware implementations can check errors at the frame level, and | |
| retry a transfer in case of errors. However, as for the flow-control | |
| case, this requires extra buffering and intelligence in the | |
| hardware. The Linux support assumes that the entire transfer is | |
| cancelled if a single error is detected in one of the responses. | |
| Abstraction required | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| There are no standard registers or mandatory implementation at the | |
| Manager level, so the low-level BPT/BRA details must be hidden in | |
| Manager-specific code. For example the Cadence IP format above is not | |
| known to the codec drivers. | |
| Likewise, codec drivers should not have to know the frame size. The | |
| computation of CRC and handling of responses is handled in helpers and | |
| Manager-specific code. | |
| The host BRA driver may also have restrictions on pages allocated for | |
| DMA, or other host-DSP communication protocols. The codec driver | |
| should not be aware of any of these restrictions, since it might be | |
| reused in combination with different implementations of Manager IPs. | |
| Concurrency between BRA and regular read/write | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| The existing 'nread/nwrite' API already relies on a notion of start | |
| address and number of bytes, so it would be possible to extend this | |
| API with a 'hint' requesting BPT/BRA be used. | |
| However BRA transfers could be quite long, and the use of a single | |
| mutex for regular read/write and BRA is a show-stopper. Independent | |
| operation of the control/command and BRA transfers is a fundamental | |
| requirement, e.g. to change the volume level with the existing regmap | |
| interface while downloading firmware. The integration must however | |
| ensure that there are no concurrent access to the same address with | |
| the command/control protocol and the BRA protocol. | |
| In addition, the 'sdw_msg' structure hard-codes support for 16-bit | |
| addresses and paging registers which are irrelevant for BPT/BRA | |
| support based on native 32-bit addresses. A separate API with | |
| 'sdw_bpt_msg' makes more sense. | |
| One possible strategy to speed-up all initialization tasks would be to | |
| start a BRA transfer for firmware download, then deal with all the | |
| "regular" read/writes in parallel with the command channel, and last | |
| to wait for the BRA transfers to complete. This would allow for a | |
| degree of overlap instead of a purely sequential solution. As such, | |
| the BRA API must support async transfers and expose a separate wait | |
| function. | |
| Peripheral/bus interface | |
| ------------------------ | |
| The bus interface for BPT/BRA is made of two functions: | |
| - sdw_bpt_send_async(bpt_message) | |
| This function sends the data using the Manager | |
| implementation-defined capabilities (typically DMA or IPC | |
| protocol). | |
| Queueing is currently not supported, the caller | |
| needs to wait for completion of the requested transfer. | |
| - sdw_bpt_wait() | |
| This function waits for the entire message provided by the | |
| codec driver in the 'send_async' stage. Intermediate status for | |
| smaller chunks will not be provided back to the codec driver, | |
| only a return code will be provided. | |
| Regmap use | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| Existing codec drivers rely on regmap to download firmware to | |
| Peripherals. regmap exposes an async interface similar to the | |
| send/wait API suggested above, so at a high-level it would seem | |
| natural to combine BRA and regmap. The regmap layer could check if BRA | |
| is available or not, and use a regular read-write command channel in | |
| the latter case. | |
| The regmap integration will be handled in a second step. | |
| BRA stream model | |
| ---------------- | |
| For regular audio transfers, the machine driver exposes a dailink | |
| connecting CPU DAI(s) and Codec DAI(s). | |
| This model is not required BRA support: | |
| (1) The SoundWire DAIs are mainly wrappers for SoundWire Data | |
| Ports, with possibly some analog or audio conversion | |
| capabilities bolted behind the Data Port. In the context of | |
| BRA, the DP0 is the destination. DP0 registers are standard and | |
| can be programmed blindly without knowing what Peripheral is | |
| connected to each link. In addition, if there are multiple | |
| Peripherals on a link and some of them do not support DP0, the | |
| write commands to program DP0 registers will generate harmless | |
| COMMAND_IGNORED responses that will be wired-ORed with | |
| responses from Peripherals which support DP0. In other words, | |
| the DP0 programming can be done with broadcast commands, and | |
| the information on the Target device can be added only in the | |
| BRA Header. | |
| (2) At the CPU level, the DAI concept is not useful for BRA; the | |
| machine driver will not create a dailink relying on DP0. The | |
| only concept that is needed is the notion of port. | |
| (3) The stream concept relies on a set of master_rt and slave_rt | |
| concepts. All of these entities represent ports and not DAIs. | |
| (4) With the assumption that a single BRA stream is used per link, | |
| that stream can connect master ports as well as all peripheral | |
| DP0 ports. | |
| (5) BRA transfers only make sense in the context of one | |
| Manager/Link, so the BRA stream handling does not rely on the | |
| concept of multi-link aggregation allowed by regular DAI links. | |
| Audio DMA support | |
| ----------------- | |
| Some DMAs, such as HDaudio, require an audio format field to be | |
| set. This format is in turn used to define acceptable bursts. BPT/BRA | |
| support is not fully compatible with these definitions in that the | |
| format and bandwidth may vary between read and write commands. | |
| In addition, on Intel HDaudio Intel platforms the DMAs need to be | |
| programmed with a PCM format matching the bandwidth of the BPT/BRA | |
| transfer. The format is based on 192kHz 32-bit samples, and the number | |
| of channels varies to adjust the bandwidth. The notion of channel is | |
| completely notional since the data is not typical audio | |
| PCM. Programming such channels helps reserve enough bandwidth and adjust | |
| FIFO sizes to avoid xruns. | |
| Alignment requirements are currently not enforced at the core level | |
| but at the platform-level, e.g. for Intel the data sizes must be | |
| equal to or larger than 16 bytes. |