| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 | |
| ====================================== | |
| Devicetree and Open Firmware Subsystem | |
| ====================================== | |
| Other Process Documents | |
| ----------------------- | |
| Please see the documents in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ for information | |
| on how to write proper Devicetree bindings and how to submit patches. | |
| Patch Review and Handling | |
| ------------------------- | |
| Patches handled by Devicetree maintainers are processed differently depending | |
| on the patch type: | |
| 1. Core OF driver code, e.g. drivers/of/: | |
| patches are reviewed and applied by DT maintainers. | |
| 2. Devicetree bindings: | |
| patches are reviewed by DT maintainers, but should be applied by subsystem | |
| maintainers except in certain cases. See also *For kernel maintainers* in | |
| Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst. | |
| 3. DTS and drivers: | |
| DT maintainers might provide comments, but review is generally not expected. | |
| DTS must pass schema checks (dtbs_check) or at least do not add any | |
| new warnings. | |
| Patchwork | |
| ~~~~~~~~~ | |
| Devicetree maintainers review patches using Patchwork, so the current status of | |
| a patch can be checked there. For typical driver submissions, Patchwork | |
| receives the entire patch set, but only a few patches are usually Devicetree | |
| bindings that are reviewed by DT maintainers. | |
| Explanation of Patchwork statuses: | |
| - **New**: Not yet processed by the automation toolset. | |
| - **Needs ACK**: Waiting for review by DT maintainers. | |
| - **Handled Elsewhere**: Non-DT patch; not being reviewed here. | |
| - **RFC**: Patch was likely ignored because it was an incomplete RFC. | |
| - **Changes Requested**: Patch was reviewed and DT maintainers expect changes. | |
| - **Accepted**: Patch was reviewed and applied by DT maintainers to their tree. | |
| - **Not Applicable**: Patch was reviewed and is likely in good shape, with a | |
| *Reviewed-by* or *Acked-by* tag provided, but DT maintainers expect someone | |
| else to apply it. | |
| Patch Re-review and Pinging | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| Due to the high volume of email traffic, Devicetree maintainers do not read | |
| every email they receive and instead rely on Patchwork during the review | |
| process. They also often skip patches that have already been reviewed. | |
| As a result, maintainers might miss: | |
| 1. Questions about already reviewed patches. | |
| 2. Pings, for example when a patch has been reviewed by DT maintainers but has | |
| not been picked up by subsystem maintainers. | |
| Such cases can be addressed by: | |
| 1. Pinging DT maintainers on the IRC channel. | |
| 2. Dropping the DT maintainer’s *Acked-by* or *Reviewed-by* tag when sending a new | |
| version of the patch set, together with an explanation in the patch | |
| changelog describing why the tag was removed and what is expected from DT | |
| maintainers. | |