| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 | 
 |  | 
 | ============= | 
 | False Sharing | 
 | ============= | 
 |  | 
 | What is False Sharing | 
 | ===================== | 
 | False sharing is related with cache mechanism of maintaining the data | 
 | coherence of one cache line stored in multiple CPU's caches; then | 
 | academic definition for it is in [1]_. Consider a struct with a | 
 | refcount and a string:: | 
 |  | 
 | 	struct foo { | 
 | 		refcount_t refcount; | 
 | 		... | 
 | 		char name[16]; | 
 | 	} ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp; | 
 |  | 
 | Member 'refcount'(A) and 'name'(B) _share_ one cache line like below:: | 
 |  | 
 |                 +-----------+                     +-----------+ | 
 |                 |   CPU 0   |                     |   CPU 1   | | 
 |                 +-----------+                     +-----------+ | 
 |                /                                        | | 
 |               /                                         | | 
 |              V                                          V | 
 |          +----------------------+             +----------------------+ | 
 |          | A      B             | Cache 0     | A       B            | Cache 1 | 
 |          +----------------------+             +----------------------+ | 
 |                              |                  | | 
 |   ---------------------------+------------------+----------------------------- | 
 |                              |                  | | 
 |                            +----------------------+ | 
 |                            |                      | | 
 |                            +----------------------+ | 
 |               Main Memory  | A       B            | | 
 |                            +----------------------+ | 
 |  | 
 | 'refcount' is modified frequently, but 'name' is set once at object | 
 | creation time and is never modified.  When many CPUs access 'foo' at | 
 | the same time, with 'refcount' being only bumped by one CPU frequently | 
 | and 'name' being read by other CPUs, all those reading CPUs have to | 
 | reload the whole cache line over and over due to the 'sharing', even | 
 | though 'name' is never changed. | 
 |  | 
 | There are many real-world cases of performance regressions caused by | 
 | false sharing.  One of these is a rw_semaphore 'mmap_lock' inside | 
 | mm_struct struct, whose cache line layout change triggered a | 
 | regression and Linus analyzed in [2]_. | 
 |  | 
 | There are two key factors for a harmful false sharing: | 
 |  | 
 | * A global datum accessed (shared) by many CPUs | 
 | * In the concurrent accesses to the data, there is at least one write | 
 |   operation: write/write or write/read cases. | 
 |  | 
 | The sharing could be from totally unrelated kernel components, or | 
 | different code paths of the same kernel component. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | False Sharing Pitfalls | 
 | ====================== | 
 | Back in time when one platform had only one or a few CPUs, hot data | 
 | members could be purposely put in the same cache line to make them | 
 | cache hot and save cacheline/TLB, like a lock and the data protected | 
 | by it.  But for recent large system with hundreds of CPUs, this may | 
 | not work when the lock is heavily contended, as the lock owner CPU | 
 | could write to the data, while other CPUs are busy spinning the lock. | 
 |  | 
 | Looking at past cases, there are several frequently occurring patterns | 
 | for false sharing: | 
 |  | 
 | * lock (spinlock/mutex/semaphore) and data protected by it are | 
 |   purposely put in one cache line. | 
 | * global data being put together in one cache line. Some kernel | 
 |   subsystems have many global parameters of small size (4 bytes), | 
 |   which can easily be grouped together and put into one cache line. | 
 | * data members of a big data structure randomly sitting together | 
 |   without being noticed (cache line is usually 64 bytes or more), | 
 |   like 'mem_cgroup' struct. | 
 |  | 
 | Following 'mitigation' section provides real-world examples. | 
 |  | 
 | False sharing could easily happen unless they are intentionally | 
 | checked, and it is valuable to run specific tools for performance | 
 | critical workloads to detect false sharing affecting performance case | 
 | and optimize accordingly. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | How to detect and analyze False Sharing | 
 | ======================================== | 
 | perf record/report/stat are widely used for performance tuning, and | 
 | once hotspots are detected, tools like 'perf-c2c' and 'pahole' can | 
 | be further used to detect and pinpoint the possible false sharing | 
 | data structures.  'addr2line' is also good at decoding instruction | 
 | pointer when there are multiple layers of inline functions. | 
 |  | 
 | perf-c2c can capture the cache lines with most false sharing hits, | 
 | decoded functions (line number of file) accessing that cache line, | 
 | and in-line offset of the data. Simple commands are:: | 
 |  | 
 |   $ perf c2c record -ag sleep 3 | 
 |   $ perf c2c report --call-graph none -k vmlinux | 
 |  | 
 | When running above during testing will-it-scale's tlb_flush1 case, | 
 | perf reports something like:: | 
 |  | 
 |   Total records                     :    1658231 | 
 |   Locked Load/Store Operations      :      89439 | 
 |   Load Operations                   :     623219 | 
 |   Load Local HITM                   :      92117 | 
 |   Load Remote HITM                  :        139 | 
 |  | 
 |   #---------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
 |       4        0     2374        0        0        0  0xff1100088366d880 | 
 |   #---------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
 |     0.00%   42.29%    0.00%    0.00%    0.00%    0x8     1       1  0xffffffff81373b7b         0       231       129     5312        64  [k] __mod_lruvec_page_state    [kernel.vmlinux]  memcontrol.h:752   1 | 
 |     0.00%   13.10%    0.00%    0.00%    0.00%    0x8     1       1  0xffffffff81374718         0       226        97     3551        64  [k] folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave  [kernel.vmlinux]  memcontrol.h:752   1 | 
 |     0.00%   11.20%    0.00%    0.00%    0.00%    0x8     1       1  0xffffffff812c29bf         0       170       136      555        64  [k] lru_add_fn                 [kernel.vmlinux]  mm_inline.h:41     1 | 
 |     0.00%    7.62%    0.00%    0.00%    0.00%    0x8     1       1  0xffffffff812c3ec5         0       175       108      632        64  [k] release_pages              [kernel.vmlinux]  mm_inline.h:41     1 | 
 |     0.00%   23.29%    0.00%    0.00%    0.00%   0x10     1       1  0xffffffff81372d0a         0       234       279     1051        64  [k] __mod_memcg_lruvec_state   [kernel.vmlinux]  memcontrol.c:736   1 | 
 |  | 
 | A nice introduction for perf-c2c is [3]_. | 
 |  | 
 | 'pahole' decodes data structure layouts delimited in cache line | 
 | granularity.  Users can match the offset in perf-c2c output with | 
 | pahole's decoding to locate the exact data members.  For global | 
 | data, users can search the data address in System.map. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Possible Mitigations | 
 | ==================== | 
 | False sharing does not always need to be mitigated.  False sharing | 
 | mitigations should balance performance gains with complexity and | 
 | space consumption.  Sometimes, lower performance is OK, and it's | 
 | unnecessary to hyper-optimize every rarely used data structure or | 
 | a cold data path. | 
 |  | 
 | False sharing hurting performance cases are seen more frequently with | 
 | core count increasing.  Because of these detrimental effects, many | 
 | patches have been proposed across variety of subsystems (like | 
 | networking and memory management) and merged.  Some common mitigations | 
 | (with examples) are: | 
 |  | 
 | * Separate hot global data in its own dedicated cache line, even if it | 
 |   is just a 'short' type. The downside is more consumption of memory, | 
 |   cache line and TLB entries. | 
 |  | 
 |   - Commit 91b6d3256356 ("net: cache align tcp_memory_allocated, tcp_sockets_allocated") | 
 |  | 
 | * Reorganize the data structure, separate the interfering members to | 
 |   different cache lines.  One downside is it may introduce new false | 
 |   sharing of other members. | 
 |  | 
 |   - Commit 802f1d522d5f ("mm: page_counter: re-layout structure to reduce false sharing") | 
 |  | 
 | * Replace 'write' with 'read' when possible, especially in loops. | 
 |   Like for some global variable, use compare(read)-then-write instead | 
 |   of unconditional write. For example, use:: | 
 |  | 
 | 	if (!test_bit(XXX)) | 
 | 		set_bit(XXX); | 
 |  | 
 |   instead of directly "set_bit(XXX);", similarly for atomic_t data:: | 
 |  | 
 | 	if (atomic_read(XXX) == AAA) | 
 | 		atomic_set(XXX, BBB); | 
 |  | 
 |   - Commit 7b1002f7cfe5 ("bcache: fixup bcache_dev_sectors_dirty_add() multithreaded CPU false sharing") | 
 |   - Commit 292648ac5cf1 ("mm: gup: allow FOLL_PIN to scale in SMP") | 
 |  | 
 | * Turn hot global data to 'per-cpu data + global data' when possible, | 
 |   or reasonably increase the threshold for syncing per-cpu data to | 
 |   global data, to reduce or postpone the 'write' to that global data. | 
 |  | 
 |   - Commit 520f897a3554 ("ext4: use percpu_counters for extent_status cache hits/misses") | 
 |   - Commit 56f3547bfa4d ("mm: adjust vm_committed_as_batch according to vm overcommit policy") | 
 |  | 
 | Surely, all mitigations should be carefully verified to not cause side | 
 | effects.  To avoid introducing false sharing when coding, it's better | 
 | to: | 
 |  | 
 | * Be aware of cache line boundaries | 
 | * Group mostly read-only fields together | 
 | * Group things that are written at the same time together | 
 | * Separate frequently read and frequently written fields on | 
 |   different cache lines. | 
 |  | 
 | and better add a comment stating the false sharing consideration. | 
 |  | 
 | One note is, sometimes even after a severe false sharing is detected | 
 | and solved, the performance may still have no obvious improvement as | 
 | the hotspot switches to a new place. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Miscellaneous | 
 | ============= | 
 | One open issue is that kernel has an optional data structure | 
 | randomization mechanism, which also randomizes the situation of cache | 
 | line sharing of data members. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | .. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_sharing | 
 | .. [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whoqV=cX5VC80mmR9rr+Z+yQ6fiQZm36Fb-izsanHg23w@mail.gmail.com/ | 
 | .. [3] https://joemario.github.io/blog/2016/09/01/c2c-blog/ |