| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 |
| |
| ====== |
| Design |
| ====== |
| |
| |
| .. _damon_design_execution_model_and_data_structures: |
| |
| Execution Model and Data Structures |
| =================================== |
| |
| The monitoring-related information including the monitoring request |
| specification and DAMON-based operation schemes are stored in a data structure |
| called DAMON ``context``. DAMON executes each context with a kernel thread |
| called ``kdamond``. Multiple kdamonds could run in parallel, for different |
| types of monitoring. |
| |
| |
| Overall Architecture |
| ==================== |
| |
| DAMON subsystem is configured with three layers including |
| |
| - Operations Set: Implements fundamental operations for DAMON that depends on |
| the given monitoring target address-space and available set of |
| software/hardware primitives, |
| - Core: Implements core logics including monitoring overhead/accurach control |
| and access-aware system operations on top of the operations set layer, and |
| - Modules: Implements kernel modules for various purposes that provides |
| interfaces for the user space, on top of the core layer. |
| |
| |
| .. _damon_design_configurable_operations_set: |
| |
| Configurable Operations Set |
| --------------------------- |
| |
| For data access monitoring and additional low level work, DAMON needs a set of |
| implementations for specific operations that are dependent on and optimized for |
| the given target address space. On the other hand, the accuracy and overhead |
| tradeoff mechanism, which is the core logic of DAMON, is in the pure logic |
| space. DAMON separates the two parts in different layers, namely DAMON |
| Operations Set and DAMON Core Logics Layers, respectively. It further defines |
| the interface between the layers to allow various operations sets to be |
| configured with the core logic. |
| |
| Due to this design, users can extend DAMON for any address space by configuring |
| the core logic to use the appropriate operations set. If any appropriate set |
| is unavailable, users can implement one on their own. |
| |
| For example, physical memory, virtual memory, swap space, those for specific |
| processes, NUMA nodes, files, and backing memory devices would be supportable. |
| Also, if some architectures or devices supporting special optimized access |
| check primitives, those will be easily configurable. |
| |
| |
| Programmable Modules |
| -------------------- |
| |
| Core layer of DAMON is implemented as a framework, and exposes its application |
| programming interface to all kernel space components such as subsystems and |
| modules. For common use cases of DAMON, DAMON subsystem provides kernel |
| modules that built on top of the core layer using the API, which can be easily |
| used by the user space end users. |
| |
| |
| .. _damon_operations_set: |
| |
| Operations Set Layer |
| ==================== |
| |
| The monitoring operations are defined in two parts: |
| |
| 1. Identification of the monitoring target address range for the address space. |
| 2. Access check of specific address range in the target space. |
| |
| DAMON currently provides below three operation sets. Below two subsections |
| describe how those work. |
| |
| - vaddr: Monitor virtual address spaces of specific processes |
| - fvaddr: Monitor fixed virtual address ranges |
| - paddr: Monitor the physical address space of the system |
| |
| |
| .. _damon_design_vaddr_target_regions_construction: |
| |
| VMA-based Target Address Range Construction |
| ------------------------------------------- |
| |
| A mechanism of ``vaddr`` DAMON operations set that automatically initializes |
| and updates the monitoring target address regions so that entire memory |
| mappings of the target processes can be covered. |
| |
| This mechanism is only for the ``vaddr`` operations set. In cases of |
| ``fvaddr`` and ``paddr`` operation sets, users are asked to manually set the |
| monitoring target address ranges. |
| |
| Only small parts in the super-huge virtual address space of the processes are |
| mapped to the physical memory and accessed. Thus, tracking the unmapped |
| address regions is just wasteful. However, because DAMON can deal with some |
| level of noise using the adaptive regions adjustment mechanism, tracking every |
| mapping is not strictly required but could even incur a high overhead in some |
| cases. That said, too huge unmapped areas inside the monitoring target should |
| be removed to not take the time for the adaptive mechanism. |
| |
| For the reason, this implementation converts the complex mappings to three |
| distinct regions that cover every mapped area of the address space. The two |
| gaps between the three regions are the two biggest unmapped areas in the given |
| address space. The two biggest unmapped areas would be the gap between the |
| heap and the uppermost mmap()-ed region, and the gap between the lowermost |
| mmap()-ed region and the stack in most of the cases. Because these gaps are |
| exceptionally huge in usual address spaces, excluding these will be sufficient |
| to make a reasonable trade-off. Below shows this in detail:: |
| |
| <heap> |
| <BIG UNMAPPED REGION 1> |
| <uppermost mmap()-ed region> |
| (small mmap()-ed regions and munmap()-ed regions) |
| <lowermost mmap()-ed region> |
| <BIG UNMAPPED REGION 2> |
| <stack> |
| |
| |
| PTE Accessed-bit Based Access Check |
| ----------------------------------- |
| |
| Both of the implementations for physical and virtual address spaces use PTE |
| Accessed-bit for basic access checks. Only one difference is the way of |
| finding the relevant PTE Accessed bit(s) from the address. While the |
| implementation for the virtual address walks the page table for the target task |
| of the address, the implementation for the physical address walks every page |
| table having a mapping to the address. In this way, the implementations find |
| and clear the bit(s) for next sampling target address and checks whether the |
| bit(s) set again after one sampling period. This could disturb other kernel |
| subsystems using the Accessed bits, namely Idle page tracking and the reclaim |
| logic. DAMON does nothing to avoid disturbing Idle page tracking, so handling |
| the interference is the responsibility of sysadmins. However, it solves the |
| conflict with the reclaim logic using ``PG_idle`` and ``PG_young`` page flags, |
| as Idle page tracking does. |
| |
| |
| Core Logics |
| =========== |
| |
| |
| Monitoring |
| ---------- |
| |
| Below four sections describe each of the DAMON core mechanisms and the five |
| monitoring attributes, ``sampling interval``, ``aggregation interval``, |
| ``update interval``, ``minimum number of regions``, and ``maximum number of |
| regions``. |
| |
| |
| Access Frequency Monitoring |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The output of DAMON says what pages are how frequently accessed for a given |
| duration. The resolution of the access frequency is controlled by setting |
| ``sampling interval`` and ``aggregation interval``. In detail, DAMON checks |
| access to each page per ``sampling interval`` and aggregates the results. In |
| other words, counts the number of the accesses to each page. After each |
| ``aggregation interval`` passes, DAMON calls callback functions that previously |
| registered by users so that users can read the aggregated results and then |
| clears the results. This can be described in below simple pseudo-code:: |
| |
| while monitoring_on: |
| for page in monitoring_target: |
| if accessed(page): |
| nr_accesses[page] += 1 |
| if time() % aggregation_interval == 0: |
| for callback in user_registered_callbacks: |
| callback(monitoring_target, nr_accesses) |
| for page in monitoring_target: |
| nr_accesses[page] = 0 |
| sleep(sampling interval) |
| |
| The monitoring overhead of this mechanism will arbitrarily increase as the |
| size of the target workload grows. |
| |
| |
| .. _damon_design_region_based_sampling: |
| |
| Region Based Sampling |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| To avoid the unbounded increase of the overhead, DAMON groups adjacent pages |
| that assumed to have the same access frequencies into a region. As long as the |
| assumption (pages in a region have the same access frequencies) is kept, only |
| one page in the region is required to be checked. Thus, for each ``sampling |
| interval``, DAMON randomly picks one page in each region, waits for one |
| ``sampling interval``, checks whether the page is accessed meanwhile, and |
| increases the access frequency counter of the region if so. The counter is |
| called ``nr_regions`` of the region. Therefore, the monitoring overhead is |
| controllable by setting the number of regions. DAMON allows users to set the |
| minimum and the maximum number of regions for the trade-off. |
| |
| This scheme, however, cannot preserve the quality of the output if the |
| assumption is not guaranteed. |
| |
| |
| Adaptive Regions Adjustment |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Even somehow the initial monitoring target regions are well constructed to |
| fulfill the assumption (pages in same region have similar access frequencies), |
| the data access pattern can be dynamically changed. This will result in low |
| monitoring quality. To keep the assumption as much as possible, DAMON |
| adaptively merges and splits each region based on their access frequency. |
| |
| For each ``aggregation interval``, it compares the access frequencies of |
| adjacent regions and merges those if the frequency difference is small. Then, |
| after it reports and clears the aggregated access frequency of each region, it |
| splits each region into two or three regions if the total number of regions |
| will not exceed the user-specified maximum number of regions after the split. |
| |
| In this way, DAMON provides its best-effort quality and minimal overhead while |
| keeping the bounds users set for their trade-off. |
| |
| |
| .. _damon_design_age_tracking: |
| |
| Age Tracking |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| By analyzing the monitoring results, users can also find how long the current |
| access pattern of a region has maintained. That could be used for good |
| understanding of the access pattern. For example, page placement algorithm |
| utilizing both the frequency and the recency could be implemented using that. |
| To make such access pattern maintained period analysis easier, DAMON maintains |
| yet another counter called ``age`` in each region. For each ``aggregation |
| interval``, DAMON checks if the region's size and access frequency |
| (``nr_accesses``) has significantly changed. If so, the counter is reset to |
| zero. Otherwise, the counter is increased. |
| |
| |
| Dynamic Target Space Updates Handling |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The monitoring target address range could dynamically changed. For example, |
| virtual memory could be dynamically mapped and unmapped. Physical memory could |
| be hot-plugged. |
| |
| As the changes could be quite frequent in some cases, DAMON allows the |
| monitoring operations to check dynamic changes including memory mapping changes |
| and applies it to monitoring operations-related data structures such as the |
| abstracted monitoring target memory area only for each of a user-specified time |
| interval (``update interval``). |
| |
| |
| .. _damon_design_damos: |
| |
| Operation Schemes |
| ----------------- |
| |
| One common purpose of data access monitoring is access-aware system efficiency |
| optimizations. For example, |
| |
| paging out memory regions that are not accessed for more than two minutes |
| |
| or |
| |
| using THP for memory regions that are larger than 2 MiB and showing a high |
| access frequency for more than one minute. |
| |
| One straightforward approach for such schemes would be profile-guided |
| optimizations. That is, getting data access monitoring results of the |
| workloads or the system using DAMON, finding memory regions of special |
| characteristics by profiling the monitoring results, and making system |
| operation changes for the regions. The changes could be made by modifying or |
| providing advice to the software (the application and/or the kernel), or |
| reconfiguring the hardware. Both offline and online approaches could be |
| available. |
| |
| Among those, providing advice to the kernel at runtime would be flexible and |
| effective, and therefore widely be used. However, implementing such schemes |
| could impose unnecessary redundancy and inefficiency. The profiling could be |
| redundant if the type of interest is common. Exchanging the information |
| including monitoring results and operation advice between kernel and user |
| spaces could be inefficient. |
| |
| To allow users to reduce such redundancy and inefficiencies by offloading the |
| works, DAMON provides a feature called Data Access Monitoring-based Operation |
| Schemes (DAMOS). It lets users specify their desired schemes at a high |
| level. For such specifications, DAMON starts monitoring, finds regions having |
| the access pattern of interest, and applies the user-desired operation actions |
| to the regions, for every user-specified time interval called |
| ``apply_interval``. |
| |
| |
| .. _damon_design_damos_action: |
| |
| Operation Action |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The management action that the users desire to apply to the regions of their |
| interest. For example, paging out, prioritizing for next reclamation victim |
| selection, advising ``khugepaged`` to collapse or split, or doing nothing but |
| collecting statistics of the regions. |
| |
| The list of supported actions is defined in DAMOS, but the implementation of |
| each action is in the DAMON operations set layer because the implementation |
| normally depends on the monitoring target address space. For example, the code |
| for paging specific virtual address ranges out would be different from that for |
| physical address ranges. And the monitoring operations implementation sets are |
| not mandated to support all actions of the list. Hence, the availability of |
| specific DAMOS action depends on what operations set is selected to be used |
| together. |
| |
| The list of the supported actions, their meaning, and DAMON operations sets |
| that supports each action are as below. |
| |
| - ``willneed``: Call ``madvise()`` for the region with ``MADV_WILLNEED``. |
| Supported by ``vaddr`` and ``fvaddr`` operations set. |
| - ``cold``: Call ``madvise()`` for the region with ``MADV_COLD``. |
| Supported by ``vaddr`` and ``fvaddr`` operations set. |
| - ``pageout``: Reclaim the region. |
| Supported by ``vaddr``, ``fvaddr`` and ``paddr`` operations set. |
| - ``hugepage``: Call ``madvise()`` for the region with ``MADV_HUGEPAGE``. |
| Supported by ``vaddr`` and ``fvaddr`` operations set. |
| - ``nohugepage``: Call ``madvise()`` for the region with ``MADV_NOHUGEPAGE``. |
| Supported by ``vaddr`` and ``fvaddr`` operations set. |
| - ``lru_prio``: Prioritize the region on its LRU lists. |
| Supported by ``paddr`` operations set. |
| - ``lru_deprio``: Deprioritize the region on its LRU lists. |
| Supported by ``paddr`` operations set. |
| - ``stat``: Do nothing but count the statistics. |
| Supported by all operations sets. |
| |
| Applying the actions except ``stat`` to a region is considered as changing the |
| region's characteristics. Hence, DAMOS resets the age of regions when any such |
| actions are applied to those. |
| |
| |
| .. _damon_design_damos_access_pattern: |
| |
| Target Access Pattern |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The access pattern of the schemes' interest. The patterns are constructed with |
| the properties that DAMON's monitoring results provide, specifically the size, |
| the access frequency, and the age. Users can describe their access pattern of |
| interest by setting minimum and maximum values of the three properties. If a |
| region's three properties are in the ranges, DAMOS classifies it as one of the |
| regions that the scheme is having an interest in. |
| |
| |
| .. _damon_design_damos_quotas: |
| |
| Quotas |
| ~~~~~~ |
| |
| DAMOS upper-bound overhead control feature. DAMOS could incur high overhead if |
| the target access pattern is not properly tuned. For example, if a huge memory |
| region having the access pattern of interest is found, applying the scheme's |
| action to all pages of the huge region could consume unacceptably large system |
| resources. Preventing such issues by tuning the access pattern could be |
| challenging, especially if the access patterns of the workloads are highly |
| dynamic. |
| |
| To mitigate that situation, DAMOS provides an upper-bound overhead control |
| feature called quotas. It lets users specify an upper limit of time that DAMOS |
| can use for applying the action, and/or a maximum bytes of memory regions that |
| the action can be applied within a user-specified time duration. |
| |
| |
| .. _damon_design_damos_quotas_prioritization: |
| |
| Prioritization |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| |
| A mechanism for making a good decision under the quotas. When the action |
| cannot be applied to all regions of interest due to the quotas, DAMOS |
| prioritizes regions and applies the action to only regions having high enough |
| priorities so that it will not exceed the quotas. |
| |
| The prioritization mechanism should be different for each action. For example, |
| rarely accessed (colder) memory regions would be prioritized for page-out |
| scheme action. In contrast, the colder regions would be deprioritized for huge |
| page collapse scheme action. Hence, the prioritization mechanisms for each |
| action are implemented in each DAMON operations set, together with the actions. |
| |
| Though the implementation is up to the DAMON operations set, it would be common |
| to calculate the priority using the access pattern properties of the regions. |
| Some users would want the mechanisms to be personalized for their specific |
| case. For example, some users would want the mechanism to weigh the recency |
| (``age``) more than the access frequency (``nr_accesses``). DAMOS allows users |
| to specify the weight of each access pattern property and passes the |
| information to the underlying mechanism. Nevertheless, how and even whether |
| the weight will be respected are up to the underlying prioritization mechanism |
| implementation. |
| |
| |
| .. _damon_design_damos_quotas_auto_tuning: |
| |
| Aim-oriented Feedback-driven Auto-tuning |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| |
| Automatic feedback-driven quota tuning. Instead of setting the absolute quota |
| value, users can specify the metric of their interest, and what target value |
| they want the metric value to be. DAMOS then automatically tunes the |
| aggressiveness (the quota) of the corresponding scheme. For example, if DAMOS |
| is under achieving the goal, DAMOS automatically increases the quota. If DAMOS |
| is over achieving the goal, it decreases the quota. |
| |
| The goal can be specified with three parameters, namely ``target_metric``, |
| ``target_value``, and ``current_value``. The auto-tuning mechanism tries to |
| make ``current_value`` of ``target_metric`` be same to ``target_value``. |
| Currently, two ``target_metric`` are provided. |
| |
| - ``user_input``: User-provided value. Users could use any metric that they |
| has interest in for the value. Use space main workload's latency or |
| throughput, system metrics like free memory ratio or memory pressure stall |
| time (PSI) could be examples. Note that users should explicitly set |
| ``current_value`` on their own in this case. In other words, users should |
| repeatedly provide the feedback. |
| - ``some_mem_psi_us``: System-wide ``some`` memory pressure stall information |
| in microseconds that measured from last quota reset to next quota reset. |
| DAMOS does the measurement on its own, so only ``target_value`` need to be |
| set by users at the initial time. In other words, DAMOS does self-feedback. |
| |
| |
| .. _damon_design_damos_watermarks: |
| |
| Watermarks |
| ~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Conditional DAMOS (de)activation automation. Users might want DAMOS to run |
| only under certain situations. For example, when a sufficient amount of free |
| memory is guaranteed, running a scheme for proactive reclamation would only |
| consume unnecessary system resources. To avoid such consumption, the user would |
| need to manually monitor some metrics such as free memory ratio, and turn |
| DAMON/DAMOS on or off. |
| |
| DAMOS allows users to offload such works using three watermarks. It allows the |
| users to configure the metric of their interest, and three watermark values, |
| namely high, middle, and low. If the value of the metric becomes above the |
| high watermark or below the low watermark, the scheme is deactivated. If the |
| metric becomes below the mid watermark but above the low watermark, the scheme |
| is activated. If all schemes are deactivated by the watermarks, the monitoring |
| is also deactivated. In this case, the DAMON worker thread only periodically |
| checks the watermarks and therefore incurs nearly zero overhead. |
| |
| |
| .. _damon_design_damos_filters: |
| |
| Filters |
| ~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Non-access pattern-based target memory regions filtering. If users run |
| self-written programs or have good profiling tools, they could know something |
| more than the kernel, such as future access patterns or some special |
| requirements for specific types of memory. For example, some users may know |
| only anonymous pages can impact their program's performance. They can also |
| have a list of latency-critical processes. |
| |
| To let users optimize DAMOS schemes with such special knowledge, DAMOS provides |
| a feature called DAMOS filters. The feature allows users to set an arbitrary |
| number of filters for each scheme. Each filter specifies the type of target |
| memory, and whether it should exclude the memory of the type (filter-out), or |
| all except the memory of the type (filter-in). |
| |
| For efficient handling of filters, some types of filters are handled by the |
| core layer, while others are handled by operations set. In the latter case, |
| hence, support of the filter types depends on the DAMON operations set. In |
| case of the core layer-handled filters, the memory regions that excluded by the |
| filter are not counted as the scheme has tried to the region. In contrast, if |
| a memory regions is filtered by an operations set layer-handled filter, it is |
| counted as the scheme has tried. This difference affects the statistics. |
| |
| Below types of filters are currently supported. |
| |
| - anonymous page |
| - Applied to pages that containing data that not stored in files. |
| - Handled by operations set layer. Supported by only ``paddr`` set. |
| - memory cgroup |
| - Applied to pages that belonging to a given cgroup. |
| - Handled by operations set layer. Supported by only ``paddr`` set. |
| - young page |
| - Applied to pages that are accessed after the last access check from the |
| scheme. |
| - Handled by operations set layer. Supported by only ``paddr`` set. |
| - address range |
| - Applied to pages that belonging to a given address range. |
| - Handled by the core logic. |
| - DAMON monitoring target |
| - Applied to pages that belonging to a given DAMON monitoring target. |
| - Handled by the core logic. |
| |
| |
| Application Programming Interface |
| --------------------------------- |
| |
| The programming interface for kernel space data access-aware applications. |
| DAMON is a framework, so it does nothing by itself. Instead, it only helps |
| other kernel components such as subsystems and modules building their data |
| access-aware applications using DAMON's core features. For this, DAMON exposes |
| its all features to other kernel components via its application programming |
| interface, namely ``include/linux/damon.h``. Please refer to the API |
| :doc:`document </mm/damon/api>` for details of the interface. |
| |
| |
| Modules |
| ======= |
| |
| Because the core of DAMON is a framework for kernel components, it doesn't |
| provide any direct interface for the user space. Such interfaces should be |
| implemented by each DAMON API user kernel components, instead. DAMON subsystem |
| itself implements such DAMON API user modules, which are supposed to be used |
| for general purpose DAMON control and special purpose data access-aware system |
| operations, and provides stable application binary interfaces (ABI) for the |
| user space. The user space can build their efficient data access-aware |
| applications using the interfaces. |
| |
| |
| General Purpose User Interface Modules |
| -------------------------------------- |
| |
| DAMON modules that provide user space ABIs for general purpose DAMON usage in |
| runtime. |
| |
| DAMON user interface modules, namely 'DAMON sysfs interface' and 'DAMON debugfs |
| interface' are DAMON API user kernel modules that provide ABIs to the |
| user-space. Please note that DAMON debugfs interface is currently deprecated. |
| |
| Like many other ABIs, the modules create files on sysfs and debugfs, allow |
| users to specify their requests to and get the answers from DAMON by writing to |
| and reading from the files. As a response to such I/O, DAMON user interface |
| modules control DAMON and retrieve the results as user requested via the DAMON |
| API, and return the results to the user-space. |
| |
| The ABIs are designed to be used for user space applications development, |
| rather than human beings' fingers. Human users are recommended to use such |
| user space tools. One such Python-written user space tool is available at |
| Github (https://github.com/awslabs/damo), Pypi |
| (https://pypistats.org/packages/damo), and Fedora |
| (https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/python-damo/damo/). |
| |
| Please refer to the ABI :doc:`document </admin-guide/mm/damon/usage>` for |
| details of the interfaces. |
| |
| |
| Special-Purpose Access-aware Kernel Modules |
| ------------------------------------------- |
| |
| DAMON modules that provide user space ABI for specific purpose DAMON usage. |
| |
| DAMON sysfs/debugfs user interfaces are for full control of all DAMON features |
| in runtime. For each special-purpose system-wide data access-aware system |
| operations such as proactive reclamation or LRU lists balancing, the interfaces |
| could be simplified by removing unnecessary knobs for the specific purpose, and |
| extended for boot-time and even compile time control. Default values of DAMON |
| control parameters for the usage would also need to be optimized for the |
| purpose. |
| |
| To support such cases, yet more DAMON API user kernel modules that provide more |
| simple and optimized user space interfaces are available. Currently, two |
| modules for proactive reclamation and LRU lists manipulation are provided. For |
| more detail, please read the usage documents for those |
| (:doc:`/admin-guide/mm/damon/reclaim` and |
| :doc:`/admin-guide/mm/damon/lru_sort`). |